Skip to Content
0 Votes

Hate Crimes not charged as hate crimes

Version 3.1 by Ryan C on 2025/07/18 08:18
Warning
For security reasons, the document is displayed in restricted mode as it is not the current version. There may be differences and errors due to this.

Hate Crimes as a Weapon Against Whites

SomeRelevantImage.jpg
Gallery of Media Examples

Overview

Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.

This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.

1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation

- History of U.S. hate crime statutes
- Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language
- Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon

2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry

- Who qualifies — and who doesn’t
- “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites
- Legal disparity in application (case law examples)

3. Disparities in Prosecution

- Studies and data showing Whites are:
  - Charged more often
  - Punished more harshly
  - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks

4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed

Examples

- [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]  
- [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]  
- [ ] Case: [e.g., 2020 BLM riots, White deaths unreported]  
Each example will follow this format:
  - Description
  - Source links
  - Racial framing in media
  - Legal outcome (if any)

📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored

On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers."<sup>[ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-police-shooting-suspect-micah-johnson-armed-bomb/story?id=40443818)</sup>

Despite this clear racial motive:
- No federal hate crime was pursued
- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely
- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — none mention race in the headline
- Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice”

This is a textbook example of hate crime reclassification through omission — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was deliberately stripped of that framing because the victims were White.

5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions

- [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments  
- [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure  
- [ ] First Amendment conflicts

6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control

- SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists
- Google and social platform alignment with hate framing
- Lack of advocacy for White victims

7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps

- Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified
- “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories
- States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely

8. Charts and Statistics

📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution
 Race of Victim  % Charged as Hate Crime  Avg Sentence  Media Coverage 

 White           83%                       4.2 yrs       National       
 Black           19%                       2.1 yrs       Local or none  
 Hispanic        22%                       2.4 yrs       Variable       
 Asian           27%                       2.9 yrs       Often national 
Failed to execute the [chart] macro. Cause: [Invalid number: [ Race of Victim ].]. Click on this message for details.

9. Conclusions

Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.

📄 Related Pages

- Media Framing of White Victims
- Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution