Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 28.1 to 29.1 From 30.1 to 31.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:34

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:20

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -299,3 +299,123 @@
  Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
  {{/expandable}}
++{{expandable summary="I'm not anti-White. I'm pro-humanity."}}
++**Claim:** Advocating for humanity as a whole cannot be anti-White.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* “Humanity” is an abstraction; real loyalty is to concrete groups.
++* Supporting policies that eliminate Whites while claiming to be “pro-humanity” is hypocrisy.
++* Other groups are never told loyalty to their own people is anti-human.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Claiming to be “pro-humanity” while supporting White genocide is contradictory. Humanity is not loyal to you; groups are loyal to their kin. Denying Whites the same loyalty every other people practices is anti-White by definition.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's a demographic shift."}}
++**Claim:** White replacement is just a natural demographic change.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Deliberate government policy is driving this shift, not random chance.
++* Calling genocide a “shift” is a rhetorical trick to normalize it.
++* No one describes other genocides as mere “demographics.”
++
++**Explanation:**
++Labeling White genocide as “demographic change” hides intent. Forced immigration and assimilation are policies, not accidents. Euphemisms cannot erase the fact that deliberate engineering of population destruction is genocide.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="They just need to assimilate."}}
++**Claim:** Non-Whites can simply assimilate into White societies.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Assimilation is often code for intermarriage, which eliminates Whites genetically.
++* “Acting White” is not the same as being White.
++* Large numbers of non-Whites inevitably bring their own group identities and behaviors.
++
++**Explanation:**
++The idea of assimilation is flawed. Cultural mimicry does not change biological identity, and mass assimilation into Whites means no Whites remain. This is erasure disguised as tolerance.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="The brown future is inevitable."}}
++**Claim:** White replacement is unavoidable, so resistance is pointless.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Declaring inevitability is a psychological tactic to demoralize resistance.
++* History is full of “inevitable” predictions proven wrong (Communism, EU integration, etc.).
++* The claim admits openly that replacement is intentional.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Telling Whites their elimination is “inevitable” is both an admission and a propaganda tactic. Nothing in history is inevitable when people resist. Predictions of inevitability are political weapons, not truths.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Diversity is our strength."}}
++**Claim:** Diversity inherently strengthens societies.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Diversity is only forced on White nations, never others.
++* Homogeneity produces the highest trust and cooperation levels.
++* Every example of diversity leads to fragmentation and conflict.
++
++**Explanation:**
++The slogan “diversity is our strength” is propaganda. No evidence supports it; in fact, the opposite is true. High-trust societies are homogeneous, while diverse societies fracture. Diversity weakens unity, it does not strengthen it.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Race is a social construct."}}
++**Claim:** Race does not exist biologically, only socially.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Genetics show clear, measurable differences between groups.
++* If race did not exist, accusations against Whites for slavery or colonialism would be meaningless.
++* Anti-Whites contradict themselves by saying race is fake but Whites are uniquely guilty.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Race denial is a contradiction. Biological differences are real and documented. The claim “race doesn’t exist” is selectively used to erase Whites, while still blaming them collectively for history. That hypocrisy exposes its true purpose.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We all came from Africa."}}
++**Claim:** Common African origins make racial distinctions meaningless.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Shared distant origins do not erase present distinctions.
++* This logic could excuse any genocide by saying “we’re all from the same place.”
++* Differences that matter now remain, regardless of ancient history.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Appealing to origins in Africa is another rhetorical trick. If all groups come from Africa, why is this only used against Whites? Distinctions exist today and define real peoples. Past migrations don’t erase present identities.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Immigration is good for the economy."}}
++**Claim:** Immigration benefits the economy, so it must be positive.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Economic benefit does not justify genocide.
++* If immigration were so beneficial, non-White countries would be wealthy.
++* Long-term costs (crime, welfare, division) outweigh temporary gains.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Reducing survival to economics is immoral. A people’s existence cannot be measured in GDP points. Even if immigration boosted some metrics, it would not justify policies that destroy a people.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You're just a Nazi fascist racist bigot supremacist."}}
++**Claim:** Anyone defending Whites is simply hateful and extremist.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* These are slurs used to silence dissent.
++* None of these labels address the actual argument.
++* Name-calling replaces debate when anti-Whites have no evidence.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Slurs like “racist” and “Nazi” are used to shut down discussion, not to refute facts. They are emotional weapons of censorship. Their overuse shows weakness, not strength, in the anti-White position.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You invaded America and Australia, now you complain about invasion?"}}
++**Claim:** Whites cannot oppose immigration because they colonized in the past.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Every race has conquered land — not just Whites.
++* Past conquest does not justify genocide today.
++* By this logic, every people should be destroyed, which is absurd.
++
++**Explanation:**
++“Whites invaded” is not a valid justification for erasing Whites now. All races have expanded and conquered. Only Whites are uniquely told their past delegitimizes their present. This exposes the argument as anti-White propaganda, not principle.
++{{/expandable}}
++