Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 27.1 to 28.1 From 29.1 to 30.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:32

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:34

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -179,4 +179,123 @@
  Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
  {{/expandable}}
++{{expandable summary="No one's chasing you down."}}
++**Claim:** Whites can still live separately if they choose.
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Any attempt by Whites to form their own communities is targeted and dismantled.
++* Segregation laws and “anti-discrimination” policies prevent White-only spaces.
++* Whites uniquely are not allowed to escape enforced diversity.
++
++**Explanation:**
++While other groups can live together, any White attempt to do the same is criminalized or attacked. From zoning restrictions to lawsuits, the message is clear: no escape from “diversity.” That is coercion.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We all came from a common ancestor."}}
++**Claim:** Since all humans share a common ancestor, race is irrelevant.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Shared origins do not justify present-day eradication.
++* By this logic, any genocide could be excused by tracing ancestry back far enough.
++* Distinctions between groups are real and present, regardless of ultimate origin.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Appealing to a “common ancestor” is not an argument against genocide. Every living creature has a distant common origin, but that does not negate the rights of distinct groups to exist today. Using this argument selectively against Whites is dishonest.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You're inbred."}}
++**Claim:** Whites are genetically damaged due to inbreeding.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Every subspecies, breed, and race arises from mutations and selective in-group reproduction.
++* Inbreeding accusations are never used as a justification for eliminating other groups.
++* Whites number in the hundreds of millions — the idea they are “inbred” is absurd.
++
++**Explanation:**
++“Inbred” is a smear, not a scientific argument. All populations display in-group reproduction at some stage. Yet only Whites are told this somehow justifies their elimination. The accusation is propaganda, not biology.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You can't control who people love."}}
++**Claim:** Intermarriage is only about free choice and love.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Mass immigration plus forced assimilation ensures intermarriage happens under engineered conditions.
++* Love is not an argument for demographic replacement programs.
++* Claiming “love” as justification ignores the coercive context of White erasure.
++
++**Explanation:**
++If an individual cannot find a partner within their own billion-strong population, that is a personal issue, not a justification for policies that eliminate an entire race. To pretend the White genocide program is “just love” is absurd.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="I can't be anti-White. I'm White."}}
++**Claim:** Whites cannot be anti-White.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Betrayal is possible within any group — traitors have existed in every nation.
++* Being White does not exempt one from enacting anti-White policies.
++* Many Whites are incentivized to oppose their own group through social and financial pressure.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Claiming identity shields one from betrayal is nonsensical. A White person who works to dismantle White survival is still anti-White. By definition, that is treachery.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Go back to Europe."}}
++**Claim:** Whites in America should return to Europe.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Europe is also being flooded with non-Whites.
++* Every nation was founded by conquest — if Whites must “go back,” then all other groups must as well.
++* Telling Whites to leave their own creation is hypocrisy.
++
++**Explanation:**
++If hating Japanese doesn’t mean leaving Japan, and hating Blacks doesn’t mean leaving Africa, then hating Whites doesn’t mean they must leave America. Whites built these nations; they have as much right to remain as anyone.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="America was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal."}}
++**Claim:** America’s founding documents establish universal equality.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* The Declaration of Independence was wartime propaganda aimed at Europe.
++* The U.S. Constitution — the actual founding law — makes no mention of equality.
++* The stated purpose of America is securing liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.”
++
++**Explanation:**
++America’s real foundation is not abstract equality but the preservation of its people. The Constitution’s preamble is explicit about posterity. Claiming universal equality as the founding purpose is revisionism.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's our values that matter."}}
++**Claim:** Shared values, not shared ancestry, define civilization.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Values arise from the genetic and cultural foundations of a people.
++* Remove the people, and the values eventually collapse.
++* No people can outsource their civilization without destroying it.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Civilization is a racial construct. White values come from the White gene pool. If White people vanish, so do their values. Pretending values float independently of people is naïve.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's 2018! The White population is growing so there can't be a White genocide."}}
++**Claim:** Whites are not disappearing, so genocide claims are exaggerated.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Anti-Whites admit they push immigration because Whites “aren’t having enough children.”
++* Genocide is defined by the attempt, not just the final outcome.
++* Attempted genocide is still genocide under UN law.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Whites may not yet be fully eliminated, but the policies are in place and openly defended. Attempted genocide is still a crime, and demographic replacement shows clear intent.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We know what your kind of talk led to in the 30's."}}
++**Claim:** Discussing White survival inevitably leads to another Holocaust.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* No historical event justifies genocide against Whites today.
++* If past atrocities justified elimination, then Turks, Japanese, and countless others would also be targeted.
++* The argument is selective and hypocritical.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
++{{/expandable}}
++