Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13
From version 23.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:14
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 24.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -59,4 +59,124 @@
59 59  Shared ancestry isn’t just a biological fact but a cultural cornerstone. For instance, European nations have historically formed alliances based on shared ethnic and cultural identities. Language families like the Indo-European group stem from this common ancestry, creating linguistic and cultural links across nations. Ignoring this connection overlooks a key factor in how civilizations form cohesive identities over time. Shared ancestry provides the framework upon which shared values and traditions are built, making it integral to cultural unity.
60 60  {{/expandable}}
61 61  
62 -
62 + {{expandable summary="You just hate people who don't look like you."}}
63 +**Claim:** Advocacy for Whites is rooted in hatred toward other races.
64 +
65 +**Rebuttal:**
66 +* If hatred were the goal, it would involve destroying other races, not defending one’s own.
67 +* It is White people being targeted with demographic flooding, not others.
68 +* Preservation of one’s group is not equivalent to hate for others.
69 +
70 +**Explanation:**
71 +Saying “you just hate people who don’t look like you” is a strawman. White advocates are not asking for the destruction of others, but for the right of their own group to survive. True hatred would look like conquest or erasure of others. The reality is that anti-White policies are creating conditions that erase Whites, and pointing that out is survival, not hate.
72 +{{/expandable}}
73 +
74 +{{expandable summary="We don’t demand that the whole world be white."}}
75 +**Claim:** Whites demand that everyone assimilate into whiteness.
76 +
77 +**Rebuttal:**
78 +* Whites are not demanding the elimination of other peoples.
79 +* It is anti-Whites who demand that every White nation becomes non-White.
80 +* The double standard exposes who is really forcing assimilation.
81 +
82 +**Explanation:**
83 +White advocacy is about preservation, not conquest. Anti-Whites constantly invert the accusation, pretending that Whites want the whole world to be White, when in reality Whites only ask for the right to maintain their own homelands and identity. The demand for a non-White world is entirely one-sided.
84 +{{/expandable}}
85 +
86 +{{expandable summary="No one's forcing assimilation."}}
87 +**Claim:** Intermixing happens voluntarily, not by force.
88 +
89 +**Rebuttal:**
90 +* White communities are denied the freedom to remain White-only.
91 +* Legal, cultural, and economic pressure enforces forced integration.
92 +* UN law defines genocide as including coerced conditions of destruction.
93 +
94 +**Explanation:**
95 +The argument that “no one’s forcing” ignores the reality: every White nation is pressured through laws, policies, and propaganda to accept mass immigration and assimilation. Under UN Resolution 260, deliberately creating conditions that erase a people is genocide, regardless of whether it involves direct violence.
96 +{{/expandable}}
97 +
98 +{{expandable summary="Have more babies."}}
99 +**Claim:** Whites can solve the problem of replacement by reproducing more.
100 +
101 +**Rebuttal:**
102 +* Telling one group to “breed or die” while enforcing policies that erase them is genocidal.
103 +* Declining fertility does not justify importing tens of millions of non-Whites.
104 +* The argument itself admits that genocidal conditions are in place.
105 +
106 +**Explanation:**
107 +Birth rates fluctuate throughout history, but no other people is told their fertility justifies their eradication. Whites are uniquely targeted with policies that replace them under the excuse of “low birth rates.” This reveals genocidal intent.
108 +{{/expandable}}
109 +
110 +{{expandable summary="America is a nation of immigrants."}}
111 +**Claim:** America is uniquely a “nation of immigrants,” so mass migration today is natural.
112 +
113 +**Rebuttal:**
114 +* Every nation has ancestors who came from elsewhere. That does not erase national identity.
115 +* Immigration is not unique to America and does not justify replacement of the founding stock.
116 +* The phrase is used selectively to push anti-White policies.
117 +
118 +**Explanation:**
119 +Saying America is a “nation of immigrants” is rhetorical sleight of hand. It ignores that every people originated somewhere. What matters is who founded and built the country. Immigration today is not the same as nation-building, and it does not justify White genocide.
120 +{{/expandable}}
121 +
122 +{{expandable summary="Stop trying to divide us."}}
123 +**Claim:** Talking about race is what creates division.
124 +
125 +**Rebuttal:**
126 +* Multiracial societies are inherently divided along racial lines.
127 +* Those who flood White countries with mass immigration are responsible for division.
128 +* The more diversity, the more racial politics dominates.
129 +
130 +**Explanation:**
131 +Blaming Whites for “division” reverses cause and effect. Division arises because diversity is imposed on Whites against their will. Every multiracial society demonstrates that racial conflict is inevitable when groups with competing interests are forced together.
132 +{{/expandable}}
133 +
134 +{{expandable summary="Identity politics is the problem."}}
135 +**Claim:** Political conflict comes from identity politics, not immigration.
136 +
137 +**Rebuttal:**
138 +* All politics in multiracial countries becomes identity politics.
139 +* Non-Whites are loyal to their groups; only Whites are told not to be.
140 +* Diversity is what drives identity politics.
141 +
142 +**Explanation:**
143 +It is dishonest to blame identity politics itself, while ignoring the cause: forced diversity. When you mix peoples with different interests, politics becomes tribal. Whites are singled out as the only group forbidden to defend themselves while everyone else is encouraged to practice group loyalty.
144 +{{/expandable}}
145 +
146 +{{expandable summary="Hate speech is not free speech."}}
147 +**Claim:** Restricting “hate speech” protects society.
148 +
149 +**Rebuttal:**
150 +* Every tyranny justifies censorship by labeling dissent as dangerous.
151 +* The current anti-White system censors truth under the guise of “hate.”
152 +* Free speech protections were meant for unpopular opinions, not state-approved ones.
153 +
154 +**Explanation:**
155 +Calling speech “hate” is a tool of repression. It is not about safety, but about silencing opposition to anti-White policies. Censorship is always framed as moral, but its effect is to protect the reigning power and punish dissent.
156 +{{/expandable}}
157 +
158 +{{expandable summary="One brown person down the street isn't genocide."}}
159 +**Claim:** Genocide is exaggerated because a single non-White doesn’t constitute a threat.
160 +
161 +**Rebuttal:**
162 +* No one argues that one person equals genocide.
163 +* The issue is mass immigration plus forced assimilation in every White country.
164 +* Strawman arguments are used to distract from the real claim.
165 +
166 +**Explanation:**
167 +Anti-Whites misrepresent the position deliberately. The argument is not about individuals but about demographic replacement through policy. Under international law, coordinated replacement policies meet the definition of genocide. Pretending it’s about “one person” is dishonest deflection.
168 +{{/expandable}}
169 +
170 +{{expandable summary="Genocide means killing. Whites aren't being killed."}}
171 +**Claim:** Genocide only applies to physical mass killings.
172 +
173 +**Rebuttal:**
174 +* UN law defines genocide to include deliberate conditions of destruction, not just killing.
175 +* Forced assimilation and mass immigration fall under this definition.
176 +* Historical precedent (Raphael Lemkin’s definition) explicitly included non-lethal methods.
177 +
178 +**Explanation:**
179 +Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
180 +{{/expandable}}
181 +
182 +