Skip to Content
0 Votes

Wiki source code of Common Arguments

Version 33.2 by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:02
Show last authors
1 {{success}}
2 These drop down style arguments are done using the expandable macro. Simply edit the page and type /expandable (it will open a selection box)
3 {{/success}}
4
5 {{expandable summary="We will all become one uniform Mixed Race"}}
6 **Claim: **Over time, humanity will homogenize into one race of mixed-race individuals due to globalization and intermixing.
7
8 **Rebuttal:**
9
10 * Blending into one race assumes uniform mixing across all populations, which is unlikely due to societal, cultural, and geographical barriers.
11 * Historical evidence shows that distinct ethnic groups have maintained separate identities for millennia despite some intermixing.
12 * High birth rates among certain populations mean some ethnic groups will likely persist as dominant demographics in specific regions.
13
14 Explanation: The idea that humanity will blend into one homogenous race oversimplifies the reality of demographic trends. Different populations have maintained their distinct identities for centuries, even under conditions of migration and intermixing. For example, despite centuries of migration into Europe, distinct ethnicities like the Basques or Sami people still exist. Additionally, demographic trends show that fertility rates vary significantly across groups, meaning some populations grow faster than others. For instance, many African and Middle Eastern countries have much higher birth rates than Europe or East Asia, making a global "blending" implausible. Societies naturally form cultural and ethnic distinctions, even when migration occurs
15
16 [[See also: White Genocide for statistics on this>>doc:Main Categories.Race.White Genocide.WebHome]]
17 {{/expandable}}
18
19 {{expandable summary="There is no discrimination against White people"}}
20 **Claim:** DEI is necessary to address historical inequities and does not disadvantage white men.
21
22 **Rebuttal:**
23
24 * DEI initiatives often include hiring quotas or preferences that explicitly exclude white men, creating new forms of systemic bias.
25 * Surveys and anecdotal evidence show that many companies deprioritize white male candidates to meet diversity metrics.
26 * Addressing historical inequities doesn’t justify creating new disparities, particularly when these policies fail to account for merit.
27
28 **Explanation:** This defense of DEI initiatives ignores the tangible harm they cause to individuals. I point to real-world examples where DEI policies lead to explicit discrimination. Companies like Coca-Cola have implemented training programs encouraging employees to "be less white," and countless hiring managers admit they deprioritize white male candidates to meet diversity quotas. These policies often overlook merit and qualifications, instead prioritizing characteristics like race or gender. While addressing historical inequities seems a noble goal, creating new inequalities that disadvantage people today doesn’t solve past injustices—it only shifts the harm to a new group.
29 {{/expandable}}
30
31 {{expandable summary="IQ disparities across groups are entirely due to environment"}}
32 **Claim:** Differences in IQ between groups are solely the result of environmental factors, dismissing any genetic contribution.
33
34 ## Relevant Studies##
35
36 * [[Rushton2005>>attach:Main Categories.Science & Research.Research at a Glance.Studies\: IQ.WebHome@rushton2005 OCR.pdf]] 
37
38 **Rebuttal:**
39
40 * While environmental factors (e.g., nutrition, education) influence IQ, genetic factors also play a significant role in group differences.
41 * The Flynn Effect demonstrates rising IQs over time due to environmental improvements, but it does not negate underlying genetic differences.
42 * Studies consistently show both genetic and environmental contributions to IQ, and ignoring one oversimplifies the issue.
43
44 **Explanation:** While environmental factors such as better nutrition and education do affect IQ, they don’t fully explain group differences. For instance, the Flynn Effect shows that average IQs have risen globally due to environmental improvements, but group differences remain consistent. Genetics play a significant role alongside the environment. Studies on twins, for example, demonstrate that IQ is highly heritable. Ignoring this fact in favor of a purely environmental explanation is intellectually dishonest. It’s not about dismissing environmental factors but about acknowledging the complex interplay of genetics and environment in shaping intelligence.
45
46
47 {{/expandable}}
48
49 {{expandable summary="Culture is what matters not race"}}
50 **Claim**: Shared ancestry among Europeans is irrelevant to their cultural unity.
51
52 **Rebuttal**:
53
54 * Shared ancestry provides a foundation for common values, language development, and traditions.
55 * Historical cooperation among European groups shows the importance of shared ancestry in forming alliances and cultural bonds.
56 * Genetic studies reveal that Europeans share significant ancestry, reinforcing their cultural cohesion.
57
58 **Explanation**:
59
60 Shared ancestry isn’t just a biological fact but a cultural cornerstone. For instance, European nations have historically formed alliances based on shared ethnic and cultural identities. Language families like the Indo-European group stem from this common ancestry, creating linguistic and cultural links across nations. Ignoring this connection overlooks a key factor in how civilizations form cohesive identities over time. Shared ancestry provides the framework upon which shared values and traditions are built, making it integral to cultural unity.
61 {{/expandable}}
62
63 {{expandable summary="You just hate people who don't look like you."}}
64 **Claim:** Advocacy for Whites is rooted in hatred toward other races. 
65
66 **Rebuttal:**
67
68 * If hatred were the goal, it would involve destroying other races, not defending one’s own. 
69 * It is White people being targeted with demographic flooding, not others. 
70 * Preservation of one’s group is not equivalent to hate for others. 
71
72 **Explanation:**
73 Saying “you just hate people who don’t look like you” is a strawman. White advocates are not asking for the destruction of others, but for the right of their own group to survive. True hatred would look like conquest or erasure of others. The reality is that anti-White policies are creating conditions that erase Whites, and pointing that out is survival, not hate.
74 {{/expandable}}
75
76 {{expandable summary="We don’t demand that the whole world be white."}}
77 **Claim:** Whites demand that everyone assimilate into whiteness. 
78
79 **Rebuttal:**
80
81 * Whites are not demanding the elimination of other peoples. 
82 * It is anti-Whites who demand that every White nation becomes non-White. 
83 * The double standard exposes who is really forcing assimilation. 
84
85 **Explanation:**
86 White advocacy is about preservation, not conquest. Anti-Whites constantly invert the accusation, pretending that Whites want the whole world to be White, when in reality Whites only ask for the right to maintain their own homelands and identity. The demand for a non-White world is entirely one-sided.
87 {{/expandable}}
88
89 {{expandable summary="No one's forcing assimilation."}}
90 **Claim:** Intermixing happens voluntarily, not by force. 
91
92 **Rebuttal:**
93
94 * White communities are denied the freedom to remain White-only. 
95 * Legal, cultural, and economic pressure enforces forced integration. 
96 * UN law defines genocide as including coerced conditions of destruction. 
97
98 **Explanation:**
99 The argument that “no one’s forcing” ignores the reality: every White nation is pressured through laws, policies, and propaganda to accept mass immigration and assimilation. Under UN Resolution 260, deliberately creating conditions that erase a people is genocide, regardless of whether it involves direct violence.
100 {{/expandable}}
101
102 {{expandable summary="Have more babies."}}
103 **Claim:** Whites can solve the problem of replacement by reproducing more. 
104
105 **Rebuttal:**
106
107 * Telling one group to “breed or die” while enforcing policies that erase them is genocidal. 
108 * Declining fertility does not justify importing tens of millions of non-Whites. 
109 * The argument itself admits that genocidal conditions are in place. 
110
111 **Explanation:**
112 Birth rates fluctuate throughout history, but no other people is told their fertility justifies their eradication. Whites are uniquely targeted with policies that replace them under the excuse of “low birth rates.” This reveals genocidal intent.
113 {{/expandable}}
114
115 {{expandable summary="America is a nation of immigrants."}}
116 **Claim:** America is uniquely a “nation of immigrants,” so mass migration today is natural. 
117
118 **Rebuttal:**
119
120 * Every nation has ancestors who came from elsewhere. That does not erase national identity. 
121 * Immigration is not unique to America and does not justify replacement of the founding stock. 
122 * The phrase is used selectively to push anti-White policies. 
123
124 **Explanation:**
125 Saying America is a “nation of immigrants” is rhetorical sleight of hand. It ignores that every people originated somewhere. What matters is who founded and built the country. Immigration today is not the same as nation-building, and it does not justify White genocide.
126 {{/expandable}}
127
128 {{expandable summary="Stop trying to divide us."}}
129 **Claim:** Talking about race is what creates division. 
130
131 **Rebuttal:**
132
133 * Multiracial societies are inherently divided along racial lines. 
134 * Those who flood White countries with mass immigration are responsible for division. 
135 * The more diversity, the more racial politics dominates. 
136
137 **Explanation:**
138 Blaming Whites for “division” reverses cause and effect. Division arises because diversity is imposed on Whites against their will. Every multiracial society demonstrates that racial conflict is inevitable when groups with competing interests are forced together.
139 {{/expandable}}
140
141 {{expandable summary="Identity politics is the problem."}}
142 **Claim:** Political conflict comes from identity politics, not immigration. 
143
144 **Rebuttal:**
145
146 * All politics in multiracial countries becomes identity politics. 
147 * Non-Whites are loyal to their groups; only Whites are told not to be. 
148 * Diversity is what drives identity politics. 
149
150 **Explanation:**
151 It is dishonest to blame identity politics itself, while ignoring the cause: forced diversity. When you mix peoples with different interests, politics becomes tribal. Whites are singled out as the only group forbidden to defend themselves while everyone else is encouraged to practice group loyalty.
152 {{/expandable}}
153
154 {{expandable summary="Hate speech is not free speech."}}
155 **Claim:** Restricting “hate speech” protects society. 
156
157 **Rebuttal:**
158
159 * Every tyranny justifies censorship by labeling dissent as dangerous. 
160 * The current anti-White system censors truth under the guise of “hate.” 
161 * Free speech protections were meant for unpopular opinions, not state-approved ones. 
162
163 **Explanation:**
164 Calling speech “hate” is a tool of repression. It is not about safety, but about silencing opposition to anti-White policies. Censorship is always framed as moral, but its effect is to protect the reigning power and punish dissent.
165 {{/expandable}}
166
167 {{expandable summary="One brown person down the street isn't genocide."}}
168 **Claim:** Genocide is exaggerated because a single non-White doesn’t constitute a threat. 
169
170 **Rebuttal:**
171
172 * No one argues that one person equals genocide. 
173 * The issue is mass immigration plus forced assimilation in every White country. 
174 * Strawman arguments are used to distract from the real claim. 
175
176 **Explanation:**
177 Anti-Whites misrepresent the position deliberately. The argument is not about individuals but about demographic replacement through policy. Under international law, coordinated replacement policies meet the definition of genocide. Pretending it’s about “one person” is dishonest deflection.
178 {{/expandable}}
179
180 {{expandable summary="Genocide means killing. Whites aren't being killed."}}
181 **Claim:** Genocide only applies to physical mass killings. 
182
183 **Rebuttal:**
184
185 * UN law defines genocide to include deliberate conditions of destruction, not just killing. 
186 * Forced assimilation and mass immigration fall under this definition. 
187 * Historical precedent (Raphael Lemkin’s definition) explicitly included non-lethal methods. 
188
189 **Explanation:**
190 Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
191 {{/expandable}}
192
193 {{expandable summary="No one's chasing you down."}}
194 **Claim:** Whites can still live separately if they choose. 
195
196 **Rebuttal:**
197
198 * Any attempt by Whites to form their own communities is targeted and dismantled. 
199 * Segregation laws and “anti-discrimination” policies prevent White-only spaces. 
200 * Whites uniquely are not allowed to escape enforced diversity. 
201
202 **Explanation:**
203 While other groups can live together, any White attempt to do the same is criminalized or attacked. From zoning restrictions to lawsuits, the message is clear: no escape from “diversity.” That is coercion.
204 {{/expandable}}
205
206 {{expandable summary="We all came from a common ancestor."}}
207 **Claim:** Since all humans share a common ancestor, race is irrelevant. 
208
209 **Rebuttal:**
210
211 * Shared origins do not justify present-day eradication. 
212 * By this logic, any genocide could be excused by tracing ancestry back far enough. 
213 * Distinctions between groups are real and present, regardless of ultimate origin. 
214
215 **Explanation:**
216 Appealing to a “common ancestor” is not an argument against genocide. Every living creature has a distant common origin, but that does not negate the rights of distinct groups to exist today. Using this argument selectively against Whites is dishonest.
217 {{/expandable}}
218
219 {{expandable summary="You're inbred."}}
220 **Claim:** Whites are genetically damaged due to inbreeding. 
221
222 **Rebuttal:**
223
224 * Every subspecies, breed, and race arises from mutations and selective in-group reproduction. 
225 * Inbreeding accusations are never used as a justification for eliminating other groups. 
226 * Whites number in the hundreds of millions — the idea they are “inbred” is absurd. 
227
228 **Explanation:**
229 “Inbred” is a smear, not a scientific argument. All populations display in-group reproduction at some stage. Yet only Whites are told this somehow justifies their elimination. The accusation is propaganda, not biology.
230 {{/expandable}}
231
232 {{expandable summary="You can't control who people love."}}
233 **Claim:** Intermarriage is only about free choice and love. 
234
235 **Rebuttal:**
236
237 * Mass immigration plus forced assimilation ensures intermarriage happens under engineered conditions. 
238 * Love is not an argument for demographic replacement programs. 
239 * Claiming “love” as justification ignores the coercive context of White erasure. 
240
241 **Explanation:**
242 If an individual cannot find a partner within their own billion-strong population, that is a personal issue, not a justification for policies that eliminate an entire race. To pretend the White genocide program is “just love” is absurd.
243 {{/expandable}}
244
245 {{expandable summary="I can't be anti-White. I'm White."}}
246 **Claim:** Whites cannot be anti-White. 
247
248 **Rebuttal:**
249
250 * Betrayal is possible within any group — traitors have existed in every nation. 
251 * Being White does not exempt one from enacting anti-White policies. 
252 * Many Whites are incentivized to oppose their own group through social and financial pressure. 
253
254 **Explanation:**
255 Claiming identity shields one from betrayal is nonsensical. A White person who works to dismantle White survival is still anti-White. By definition, that is treachery.
256 {{/expandable}}
257
258 {{expandable summary="Go back to Europe."}}
259 **Claim:** Whites in America should return to Europe. 
260
261 **Rebuttal:**
262
263 * Europe is also being flooded with non-Whites. 
264 * Every nation was founded by conquest — if Whites must “go back,” then all other groups must as well. 
265 * Telling Whites to leave their own creation is hypocrisy. 
266
267 **Explanation:**
268 If hating Japanese doesn’t mean leaving Japan, and hating Blacks doesn’t mean leaving Africa, then hating Whites doesn’t mean they must leave America. Whites built these nations; they have as much right to remain as anyone. 
269 {{/expandable}}
270
271 {{expandable summary="America was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal."}}
272 **Claim:** America’s founding documents establish universal equality. 
273
274 **Rebuttal:**
275
276 * The Declaration of Independence was wartime propaganda aimed at Europe. 
277 * The U.S. Constitution — the actual founding law — makes no mention of equality. 
278 * The stated purpose of America is securing liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.” 
279
280 **Explanation:**
281 America’s real foundation is not abstract equality but the preservation of its people. The Constitution’s preamble is explicit about posterity. Claiming universal equality as the founding purpose is revisionism.
282 {{/expandable}}
283
284 {{expandable summary="It's our values that matter."}}
285 **Claim:** Shared values, not shared ancestry, define civilization. 
286
287 **Rebuttal:**
288
289 * Values arise from the genetic and cultural foundations of a people. 
290 * Remove the people, and the values eventually collapse. 
291 * No people can outsource their civilization without destroying it. 
292
293 **Explanation:**
294 Civilization is a racial construct. White values come from the White gene pool. If White people vanish, so do their values. Pretending values float independently of people is naïve.
295 {{/expandable}}
296
297 {{expandable summary="It's 2018! The White population is growing so there can't be a White genocide."}}
298 **Claim:** Whites are not disappearing, so genocide claims are exaggerated. 
299
300 **Rebuttal:**
301
302 * Anti-Whites admit they push immigration because Whites “aren’t having enough children.” 
303 * Genocide is defined by the attempt, not just the final outcome. 
304 * Attempted genocide is still genocide under UN law. 
305
306 **Explanation:**
307 Whites may not yet be fully eliminated, but the policies are in place and openly defended. Attempted genocide is still a crime, and demographic replacement shows clear intent.
308 {{/expandable}}
309
310 {{expandable summary="We know what your kind of talk led to in the 30's."}}
311 **Claim:** Discussing White survival inevitably leads to another Holocaust. 
312
313 **Rebuttal:**
314
315 * No historical event justifies genocide against Whites today. 
316 * If past atrocities justified elimination, then Turks, Japanese, and countless others would also be targeted. 
317 * The argument is selective and hypocritical. 
318
319 **Explanation:**
320 Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
321 {{/expandable}}
322
323 {{expandable summary="I'm not anti-White. I'm pro-humanity."}}
324 **Claim:** Advocating for humanity as a whole cannot be anti-White. 
325
326 **Rebuttal:**
327
328 * “Humanity” is an abstraction; real loyalty is to concrete groups. 
329 * Supporting policies that eliminate Whites while claiming to be “pro-humanity” is hypocrisy. 
330 * Other groups are never told loyalty to their own people is anti-human. 
331
332 **Explanation:**
333 Claiming to be “pro-humanity” while supporting White genocide is contradictory. Humanity is not loyal to you; groups are loyal to their kin. Denying Whites the same loyalty every other people practices is anti-White by definition.
334 {{/expandable}}
335
336 {{expandable summary="It's a demographic shift."}}
337 **Claim:** White replacement is just a natural demographic change. 
338
339 **Rebuttal:**
340
341 * Deliberate government policy is driving this shift, not random chance. 
342 * Calling genocide a “shift” is a rhetorical trick to normalize it. 
343 * No one describes other genocides as mere “demographics.” 
344
345 **Explanation:**
346 Labeling White genocide as “demographic change” hides intent. Forced immigration and assimilation are policies, not accidents. Euphemisms cannot erase the fact that deliberate engineering of population destruction is genocide.
347 {{/expandable}}
348
349 {{expandable summary="They just need to assimilate."}}
350 **Claim:** Non-Whites can simply assimilate into White societies. 
351
352 **Rebuttal:**
353
354 * Assimilation is often code for intermarriage, which eliminates Whites genetically. 
355 * “Acting White” is not the same as being White. 
356 * Large numbers of non-Whites inevitably bring their own group identities and behaviors. 
357
358 **Explanation:**
359 The idea of assimilation is flawed. Cultural mimicry does not change biological identity, and mass assimilation into Whites means no Whites remain. This is erasure disguised as tolerance.
360 {{/expandable}}
361
362 {{expandable summary="The brown future is inevitable."}}
363 **Claim:** White replacement is unavoidable, so resistance is pointless. 
364
365 **Rebuttal:**
366
367 * Declaring inevitability is a psychological tactic to demoralize resistance. 
368 * History is full of “inevitable” predictions proven wrong (Communism, EU integration, etc.). 
369 * The claim admits openly that replacement is intentional. 
370
371 **Explanation:**
372 Telling Whites their elimination is “inevitable” is both an admission and a propaganda tactic. Nothing in history is inevitable when people resist. Predictions of inevitability are political weapons, not truths.
373 {{/expandable}}
374
375 {{expandable summary="Diversity is our strength."}}
376 **Claim:** Diversity inherently strengthens societies. 
377
378 **Rebuttal:**
379
380 * Diversity is only forced on White nations, never others. 
381 * Homogeneity produces the highest trust and cooperation levels. 
382 * Every example of diversity leads to fragmentation and conflict. 
383
384 **Explanation:**
385 The slogan “diversity is our strength” is propaganda. No evidence supports it; in fact, the opposite is true. High-trust societies are homogeneous, while diverse societies fracture. Diversity weakens unity, it does not strengthen it.
386 {{/expandable}}
387
388 {{expandable summary="Race is a social construct."}}
389 **Claim:** Race does not exist biologically, only socially. 
390
391 **Rebuttal:**
392
393 * Genetics show clear, measurable differences between groups. 
394 * If race did not exist, accusations against Whites for slavery or colonialism would be meaningless. 
395 * Anti-Whites contradict themselves by saying race is fake but Whites are uniquely guilty. 
396
397 **Explanation:**
398 Race denial is a contradiction. Biological differences are real and documented. The claim “race doesn’t exist” is selectively used to erase Whites, while still blaming them collectively for history. That hypocrisy exposes its true purpose.
399 {{/expandable}}
400
401 {{expandable summary="We all came from Africa."}}
402 **Claim:** Common African origins make racial distinctions meaningless. 
403
404 **Rebuttal:**
405
406 * Shared distant origins do not erase present distinctions. 
407 * This logic could excuse any genocide by saying “we’re all from the same place.” 
408 * Differences that matter now remain, regardless of ancient history. 
409
410 **Explanation:**
411 Appealing to origins in Africa is another rhetorical trick. If all groups come from Africa, why is this only used against Whites? Distinctions exist today and define real peoples. Past migrations don’t erase present identities.
412 {{/expandable}}
413
414 {{expandable summary="Immigration is good for the economy."}}
415 **Claim:** Immigration benefits the economy, so it must be positive. 
416
417 **Rebuttal:**
418
419 * Economic benefit does not justify genocide. 
420 * If immigration were so beneficial, non-White countries would be wealthy. 
421 * Long-term costs (crime, welfare, division) outweigh temporary gains. 
422
423 **Explanation:**
424 Reducing survival to economics is immoral. A people’s existence cannot be measured in GDP points. Even if immigration boosted some metrics, it would not justify policies that destroy a people.
425 {{/expandable}}
426
427 {{expandable summary="You're just a Nazi fascist racist bigot supremacist."}}
428 **Claim:** Anyone defending Whites is simply hateful and extremist. 
429
430 **Rebuttal:**
431
432 * These are slurs used to silence dissent. 
433 * None of these labels address the actual argument. 
434 * Name-calling replaces debate when anti-Whites have no evidence. 
435
436 **Explanation:**
437 Slurs like “racist” and “Nazi” are used to shut down discussion, not to refute facts. They are emotional weapons of censorship. Their overuse shows weakness, not strength, in the anti-White position.
438 {{/expandable}}
439
440 {{expandable summary="You invaded America and Australia, now you complain about invasion?"}}
441 **Claim:** Whites cannot oppose immigration because they colonized in the past. 
442
443 **Rebuttal:**
444
445 * Every race has conquered land — not just Whites. 
446 * Past conquest does not justify genocide today. 
447 * By this logic, every people should be destroyed, which is absurd. 
448
449 **Explanation:**
450 “Whites invaded” is not a valid justification for erasing Whites now. All races have expanded and conquered. Only Whites are uniquely told their past delegitimizes their present. This exposes the argument as anti-White propaganda, not principle.
451 {{/expandable}}
452
453 {{expandable summary="Would Christ turn away sufferers?"}}
454 **Claim: **It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
455 **Rebuttal:**
456
457 * Aren't Jews Gods chosen people? Didn't he give them Israel?
458 * If these people are suffering and they are hardworking decent people, wouldn't it cause more suffering to take them away from the countries that need help the most?
459
460 **Explanation:**
461 God himself separated the races at the Tower of Babel and clearly designed us with different features. So not only does it do more harm than good by allowing ourselves to be demographically swamped and die out, it accomplishes nothing. Non white nations will be worse off with us gone, not better off.
462 {{/expandable}}
463
464 {{expandable summary="White privilege is unfair."}}
465 **Claim:** Whites deserve whats happening because of their privilege.
466 **Rebuttal:**
467
468 * This isn't even true, whites are the most attacked group in America and aren't allowed any advocacies.
469 * Even if it were true, it wouldn't justify us dying out
470 * If this was true, it would only apply to White countries. Do you think asians dont have Asian privilege in Asian countries?
471
472 **Explanation:**
473 If whites have privilege it doesn’t justify white genocide.
474 {{/expandable}}
475
476 {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
477 **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
478 **Rebuttal:**
479
480 * Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
481 * Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
482 * A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
483
484 **Explanation:** Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
485 {{/expandable}}
486
487 {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
488 **Claim**: Whites stole America.
489 **Rebuttal:**
490
491 * All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
492 * Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
493
494 Calling White conquest “theft” implies illegitimacy, but never applies that label to non-Whites doing the same.
495 Explanation: If conquest voids legitimacy, then no nation or people can claim land. Singling out Whites is hypocrisy.
496 {{/expandable}}
497
498 {{expandable summary="Contradictory anti-White logic on land and borders."}}
499 **Claim: **Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
500 **Rebuttal:**
501
502 * If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
503 * If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
504 * Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
505
506 **Explanation:**
507 This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
508 {{/expandable}}
509
510 {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
511 **Claim: **Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
512 **Rebuttal:**
513
514 * Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
515 * Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
516 * If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
517
518 **Explanation: **
519 History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
520 {{/expandable}}
521
522 {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
523 **Claim: **Whites stole America.
524 **Rebuttal:**
525
526 * If Whites stole it, then it is by definition a White country now.
527 * Diversity did not “steal” America; conquest and settlement did.
528
529 **Explanation:**
530 The rhetoric inadvertently admits the truth of ownership and establishment.
531 Explanation: To claim theft is to admit transfer of possession. By their own words, America is a White nation.
532 {{/expandable}}
533
534 {{expandable summary="If America was stolen, leave it."}}
535 **Claim: **America was stolen from Indians.
536 **Rebuttal:**
537
538 * If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
539 * Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
540 * Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
541
542 **Explanation:**
543 Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
544 {{/expandable}}
545
546 {{expandable summary="Welfare argument is irrelevant."}}
547 **Claim: **Most people on welfare are White.
548 **Rebuttal:**
549
550 * Welfare statistics do not justify demographic replacement.
551 * Whites paying into the system far exceed non-Whites, meaning redistribution favors others.
552 * Poverty does not make a people disposable.
553
554 **Explanation:**
555 Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
556 {{/expandable}}
557
558 {{expandable summary="Whites have no culture."}}
559 **Claim:** Whites have no culture.
560 **Rebuttal:**
561
562 * Western civilization is one of the richest cultural traditions in history.
563 * Claiming a people “doesn’t exist” is a known genocidal tactic.
564 * Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
565
566 **Explanation:**
567 Explanation: Delegitimizing culture is psychological warfare. It is proof of genocidal intent.
568 {{/expandable}}
569
570 {{expandable summary="Globalists vs White genocide."}}
571 **Claim: **Globalists are the real enemy, focus on them.
572 **Rebuttal:**
573
574 * Globalists are dangerous, but they target Whites specifically for elimination.
575 * White nations must first secure survival before joining broader struggles.
576 * Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide
577
578 **Explanation:**
579 Explanation: Global battles cannot be fought if Whites are erased. Survival comes before coalition.
580 {{/expandable}}
581
582 {{expandable summary="Europe is the White homeland."}}
583 **Claim: **Whites must go back to Europe.
584 **Rebuttal:**
585
586 * By that logic, all non-Whites should leave Europe.
587 * Should Turks leave Constantinople? Should Bantus vacate southern Africa? Should tribes vacate lands they conquered?
588 * Conquest and migration are universal; only Whites are told to leave.
589 * Explanation: The “go back” demand is not about fairness, but about dispossessing Whites uniquely. Do you think all non-whites should leave Europe?
590
591 **Explanation:**
592 Do you think all non-Siberians should leave America?
593 All races have conquered land. Whites have as much right to land they conquered as every other race. Should Turks give Constantinople back to the white people they stole it from? Should Congoids give back the land they stole from Capoids in southern Africa? Should Ojibwe give back land they stole from Lakota?
594 {{/expandable}}