Skip to Content
0 Votes

Wiki source code of Common Myths

Version 31.1 by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 00:49
Show last authors
1 {{success}}
2 These drop down style arguments are done using the expandable macro. Simply edit the page and type /expandable (it will open a selection box)
3 {{/success}}
4
5 {{expandable summary="We will all become one uniform Mixed Race"}}
6 Claim: Over time, humanity will homogenize into one race of mixed-race individuals due to globalization and intermixing.
7
8 Rebuttal:
9
10 Blending into one race assumes uniform mixing across all populations, which is unlikely due to societal, cultural, and geographical barriers.
11 Historical evidence shows that distinct ethnic groups have maintained separate identities for millennia despite some intermixing.
12 High birth rates among certain populations mean some ethnic groups will likely persist as dominant demographics in specific regions.
13 Explanation: The idea that humanity will blend into one homogenous race oversimplifies the reality of demographic trends. Different populations have maintained their distinct identities for centuries, even under conditions of migration and intermixing. For example, despite centuries of migration into Europe, distinct ethnicities like the Basques or Sami people still exist. Additionally, demographic trends show that fertility rates vary significantly across groups, meaning some populations grow faster than others. For instance, many African and Middle Eastern countries have much higher birth rates than Europe or East Asia, making a global "blending" implausible. Societies naturally form cultural and ethnic distinctions, even when migration occurs
14
15 [[See also: White Genocide for statistics on this>>doc:Main Categories.Race.White Genocide.WebHome]]
16 {{/expandable}}
17
18 {{expandable summary="There is no discrimination against White people"}}
19 **Claim:** DEI is necessary to address historical inequities and does not disadvantage white men.
20
21 **Rebuttal:**
22
23 * DEI initiatives often include hiring quotas or preferences that explicitly exclude white men, creating new forms of systemic bias.
24 * Surveys and anecdotal evidence show that many companies deprioritize white male candidates to meet diversity metrics.
25 * Addressing historical inequities doesn’t justify creating new disparities, particularly when these policies fail to account for merit.
26
27 **Explanation:** This defense of DEI initiatives ignores the tangible harm they cause to individuals. I point to real-world examples where DEI policies lead to explicit discrimination. Companies like Coca-Cola have implemented training programs encouraging employees to "be less white," and countless hiring managers admit they deprioritize white male candidates to meet diversity quotas. These policies often overlook merit and qualifications, instead prioritizing characteristics like race or gender. While addressing historical inequities seems a noble goal, creating new inequalities that disadvantage people today doesn’t solve past injustices—it only shifts the harm to a new group.
28 {{/expandable}}
29
30 {{expandable summary="IQ disparities across groups are entirely due to environment"}}
31 **Claim:** Differences in IQ between groups are solely the result of environmental factors, dismissing any genetic contribution.
32
33 ## Relevant Studies##
34
35 * [[Rushton2005>>attach:Main Categories.Science & Research.Research at a Glance.Studies\: IQ.WebHome@rushton2005 OCR.pdf]]
36
37 **Rebuttal:**
38
39 * While environmental factors (e.g., nutrition, education) influence IQ, genetic factors also play a significant role in group differences.
40 * The Flynn Effect demonstrates rising IQs over time due to environmental improvements, but it does not negate underlying genetic differences.
41 * Studies consistently show both genetic and environmental contributions to IQ, and ignoring one oversimplifies the issue.
42
43 **Explanation:** While environmental factors such as better nutrition and education do affect IQ, they don’t fully explain group differences. For instance, the Flynn Effect shows that average IQs have risen globally due to environmental improvements, but group differences remain consistent. Genetics play a significant role alongside the environment. Studies on twins, for example, demonstrate that IQ is highly heritable. Ignoring this fact in favor of a purely environmental explanation is intellectually dishonest. It’s not about dismissing environmental factors but about acknowledging the complex interplay of genetics and environment in shaping intelligence.
44
45
46 {{/expandable}}
47
48 {{expandable summary="Culture is what matters not race"}}
49 **Claim**: Shared ancestry among Europeans is irrelevant to their cultural unity.
50
51 **Rebuttal**:
52
53 * Shared ancestry provides a foundation for common values, language development, and traditions.
54 * Historical cooperation among European groups shows the importance of shared ancestry in forming alliances and cultural bonds.
55 * Genetic studies reveal that Europeans share significant ancestry, reinforcing their cultural cohesion.
56
57 **Explanation**:
58
59 Shared ancestry isn’t just a biological fact but a cultural cornerstone. For instance, European nations have historically formed alliances based on shared ethnic and cultural identities. Language families like the Indo-European group stem from this common ancestry, creating linguistic and cultural links across nations. Ignoring this connection overlooks a key factor in how civilizations form cohesive identities over time. Shared ancestry provides the framework upon which shared values and traditions are built, making it integral to cultural unity.
60 {{/expandable}}
61
62 {{expandable summary="You just hate people who don't look like you."}}
63 **Claim:** Advocacy for Whites is rooted in hatred toward other races.
64
65 **Rebuttal:**
66 * If hatred were the goal, it would involve destroying other races, not defending one’s own.
67 * It is White people being targeted with demographic flooding, not others.
68 * Preservation of one’s group is not equivalent to hate for others.
69
70 **Explanation:**
71 Saying “you just hate people who don’t look like you” is a strawman. White advocates are not asking for the destruction of others, but for the right of their own group to survive. True hatred would look like conquest or erasure of others. The reality is that anti-White policies are creating conditions that erase Whites, and pointing that out is survival, not hate.
72 {{/expandable}}
73
74 {{expandable summary="We don’t demand that the whole world be white."}}
75 **Claim:** Whites demand that everyone assimilate into whiteness.
76
77 **Rebuttal:**
78 * Whites are not demanding the elimination of other peoples.
79 * It is anti-Whites who demand that every White nation becomes non-White.
80 * The double standard exposes who is really forcing assimilation.
81
82 **Explanation:**
83 White advocacy is about preservation, not conquest. Anti-Whites constantly invert the accusation, pretending that Whites want the whole world to be White, when in reality Whites only ask for the right to maintain their own homelands and identity. The demand for a non-White world is entirely one-sided.
84 {{/expandable}}
85
86 {{expandable summary="No one's forcing assimilation."}}
87 **Claim:** Intermixing happens voluntarily, not by force.
88
89 **Rebuttal:**
90 * White communities are denied the freedom to remain White-only.
91 * Legal, cultural, and economic pressure enforces forced integration.
92 * UN law defines genocide as including coerced conditions of destruction.
93
94 **Explanation:**
95 The argument that “no one’s forcing” ignores the reality: every White nation is pressured through laws, policies, and propaganda to accept mass immigration and assimilation. Under UN Resolution 260, deliberately creating conditions that erase a people is genocide, regardless of whether it involves direct violence.
96 {{/expandable}}
97
98 {{expandable summary="Have more babies."}}
99 **Claim:** Whites can solve the problem of replacement by reproducing more.
100
101 **Rebuttal:**
102 * Telling one group to “breed or die” while enforcing policies that erase them is genocidal.
103 * Declining fertility does not justify importing tens of millions of non-Whites.
104 * The argument itself admits that genocidal conditions are in place.
105
106 **Explanation:**
107 Birth rates fluctuate throughout history, but no other people is told their fertility justifies their eradication. Whites are uniquely targeted with policies that replace them under the excuse of “low birth rates.” This reveals genocidal intent.
108 {{/expandable}}
109
110 {{expandable summary="America is a nation of immigrants."}}
111 **Claim:** America is uniquely a “nation of immigrants,” so mass migration today is natural.
112
113 **Rebuttal:**
114 * Every nation has ancestors who came from elsewhere. That does not erase national identity.
115 * Immigration is not unique to America and does not justify replacement of the founding stock.
116 * The phrase is used selectively to push anti-White policies.
117
118 **Explanation:**
119 Saying America is a “nation of immigrants” is rhetorical sleight of hand. It ignores that every people originated somewhere. What matters is who founded and built the country. Immigration today is not the same as nation-building, and it does not justify White genocide.
120 {{/expandable}}
121
122 {{expandable summary="Stop trying to divide us."}}
123 **Claim:** Talking about race is what creates division.
124
125 **Rebuttal:**
126 * Multiracial societies are inherently divided along racial lines.
127 * Those who flood White countries with mass immigration are responsible for division.
128 * The more diversity, the more racial politics dominates.
129
130 **Explanation:**
131 Blaming Whites for “division” reverses cause and effect. Division arises because diversity is imposed on Whites against their will. Every multiracial society demonstrates that racial conflict is inevitable when groups with competing interests are forced together.
132 {{/expandable}}
133
134 {{expandable summary="Identity politics is the problem."}}
135 **Claim:** Political conflict comes from identity politics, not immigration.
136
137 **Rebuttal:**
138 * All politics in multiracial countries becomes identity politics.
139 * Non-Whites are loyal to their groups; only Whites are told not to be.
140 * Diversity is what drives identity politics.
141
142 **Explanation:**
143 It is dishonest to blame identity politics itself, while ignoring the cause: forced diversity. When you mix peoples with different interests, politics becomes tribal. Whites are singled out as the only group forbidden to defend themselves while everyone else is encouraged to practice group loyalty.
144 {{/expandable}}
145
146 {{expandable summary="Hate speech is not free speech."}}
147 **Claim:** Restricting “hate speech” protects society.
148
149 **Rebuttal:**
150 * Every tyranny justifies censorship by labeling dissent as dangerous.
151 * The current anti-White system censors truth under the guise of “hate.”
152 * Free speech protections were meant for unpopular opinions, not state-approved ones.
153
154 **Explanation:**
155 Calling speech “hate” is a tool of repression. It is not about safety, but about silencing opposition to anti-White policies. Censorship is always framed as moral, but its effect is to protect the reigning power and punish dissent.
156 {{/expandable}}
157
158 {{expandable summary="One brown person down the street isn't genocide."}}
159 **Claim:** Genocide is exaggerated because a single non-White doesn’t constitute a threat.
160
161 **Rebuttal:**
162 * No one argues that one person equals genocide.
163 * The issue is mass immigration plus forced assimilation in every White country.
164 * Strawman arguments are used to distract from the real claim.
165
166 **Explanation:**
167 Anti-Whites misrepresent the position deliberately. The argument is not about individuals but about demographic replacement through policy. Under international law, coordinated replacement policies meet the definition of genocide. Pretending it’s about “one person” is dishonest deflection.
168 {{/expandable}}
169
170 {{expandable summary="Genocide means killing. Whites aren't being killed."}}
171 **Claim:** Genocide only applies to physical mass killings.
172
173 **Rebuttal:**
174 * UN law defines genocide to include deliberate conditions of destruction, not just killing.
175 * Forced assimilation and mass immigration fall under this definition.
176 * Historical precedent (Raphael Lemkin’s definition) explicitly included non-lethal methods.
177
178 **Explanation:**
179 Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
180 {{/expandable}}
181
182 {{expandable summary="No one's chasing you down."}}
183 **Claim:** Whites can still live separately if they choose.
184
185 **Rebuttal:**
186 * Any attempt by Whites to form their own communities is targeted and dismantled.
187 * Segregation laws and “anti-discrimination” policies prevent White-only spaces.
188 * Whites uniquely are not allowed to escape enforced diversity.
189
190 **Explanation:**
191 While other groups can live together, any White attempt to do the same is criminalized or attacked. From zoning restrictions to lawsuits, the message is clear: no escape from “diversity.” That is coercion.
192 {{/expandable}}
193
194 {{expandable summary="We all came from a common ancestor."}}
195 **Claim:** Since all humans share a common ancestor, race is irrelevant.
196
197 **Rebuttal:**
198 * Shared origins do not justify present-day eradication.
199 * By this logic, any genocide could be excused by tracing ancestry back far enough.
200 * Distinctions between groups are real and present, regardless of ultimate origin.
201
202 **Explanation:**
203 Appealing to a “common ancestor” is not an argument against genocide. Every living creature has a distant common origin, but that does not negate the rights of distinct groups to exist today. Using this argument selectively against Whites is dishonest.
204 {{/expandable}}
205
206 {{expandable summary="You're inbred."}}
207 **Claim:** Whites are genetically damaged due to inbreeding.
208
209 **Rebuttal:**
210 * Every subspecies, breed, and race arises from mutations and selective in-group reproduction.
211 * Inbreeding accusations are never used as a justification for eliminating other groups.
212 * Whites number in the hundreds of millions — the idea they are “inbred” is absurd.
213
214 **Explanation:**
215 “Inbred” is a smear, not a scientific argument. All populations display in-group reproduction at some stage. Yet only Whites are told this somehow justifies their elimination. The accusation is propaganda, not biology.
216 {{/expandable}}
217
218 {{expandable summary="You can't control who people love."}}
219 **Claim:** Intermarriage is only about free choice and love.
220
221 **Rebuttal:**
222 * Mass immigration plus forced assimilation ensures intermarriage happens under engineered conditions.
223 * Love is not an argument for demographic replacement programs.
224 * Claiming “love” as justification ignores the coercive context of White erasure.
225
226 **Explanation:**
227 If an individual cannot find a partner within their own billion-strong population, that is a personal issue, not a justification for policies that eliminate an entire race. To pretend the White genocide program is “just love” is absurd.
228 {{/expandable}}
229
230 {{expandable summary="I can't be anti-White. I'm White."}}
231 **Claim:** Whites cannot be anti-White.
232
233 **Rebuttal:**
234 * Betrayal is possible within any group — traitors have existed in every nation.
235 * Being White does not exempt one from enacting anti-White policies.
236 * Many Whites are incentivized to oppose their own group through social and financial pressure.
237
238 **Explanation:**
239 Claiming identity shields one from betrayal is nonsensical. A White person who works to dismantle White survival is still anti-White. By definition, that is treachery.
240 {{/expandable}}
241
242 {{expandable summary="Go back to Europe."}}
243 **Claim:** Whites in America should return to Europe.
244
245 **Rebuttal:**
246 * Europe is also being flooded with non-Whites.
247 * Every nation was founded by conquest — if Whites must “go back,” then all other groups must as well.
248 * Telling Whites to leave their own creation is hypocrisy.
249
250 **Explanation:**
251 If hating Japanese doesn’t mean leaving Japan, and hating Blacks doesn’t mean leaving Africa, then hating Whites doesn’t mean they must leave America. Whites built these nations; they have as much right to remain as anyone.
252 {{/expandable}}
253
254 {{expandable summary="America was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal."}}
255 **Claim:** America’s founding documents establish universal equality.
256
257 **Rebuttal:**
258 * The Declaration of Independence was wartime propaganda aimed at Europe.
259 * The U.S. Constitution — the actual founding law — makes no mention of equality.
260 * The stated purpose of America is securing liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.”
261
262 **Explanation:**
263 America’s real foundation is not abstract equality but the preservation of its people. The Constitution’s preamble is explicit about posterity. Claiming universal equality as the founding purpose is revisionism.
264 {{/expandable}}
265
266 {{expandable summary="It's our values that matter."}}
267 **Claim:** Shared values, not shared ancestry, define civilization.
268
269 **Rebuttal:**
270 * Values arise from the genetic and cultural foundations of a people.
271 * Remove the people, and the values eventually collapse.
272 * No people can outsource their civilization without destroying it.
273
274 **Explanation:**
275 Civilization is a racial construct. White values come from the White gene pool. If White people vanish, so do their values. Pretending values float independently of people is naïve.
276 {{/expandable}}
277
278 {{expandable summary="It's 2018! The White population is growing so there can't be a White genocide."}}
279 **Claim:** Whites are not disappearing, so genocide claims are exaggerated.
280
281 **Rebuttal:**
282 * Anti-Whites admit they push immigration because Whites “aren’t having enough children.”
283 * Genocide is defined by the attempt, not just the final outcome.
284 * Attempted genocide is still genocide under UN law.
285
286 **Explanation:**
287 Whites may not yet be fully eliminated, but the policies are in place and openly defended. Attempted genocide is still a crime, and demographic replacement shows clear intent.
288 {{/expandable}}
289
290 {{expandable summary="We know what your kind of talk led to in the 30's."}}
291 **Claim:** Discussing White survival inevitably leads to another Holocaust.
292
293 **Rebuttal:**
294 * No historical event justifies genocide against Whites today.
295 * If past atrocities justified elimination, then Turks, Japanese, and countless others would also be targeted.
296 * The argument is selective and hypocritical.
297
298 **Explanation:**
299 Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
300 {{/expandable}}
301
302 {{expandable summary="I'm not anti-White. I'm pro-humanity."}}
303 **Claim:** Advocating for humanity as a whole cannot be anti-White.
304
305 **Rebuttal:**
306 * “Humanity” is an abstraction; real loyalty is to concrete groups.
307 * Supporting policies that eliminate Whites while claiming to be “pro-humanity” is hypocrisy.
308 * Other groups are never told loyalty to their own people is anti-human.
309
310 **Explanation:**
311 Claiming to be “pro-humanity” while supporting White genocide is contradictory. Humanity is not loyal to you; groups are loyal to their kin. Denying Whites the same loyalty every other people practices is anti-White by definition.
312 {{/expandable}}
313
314 {{expandable summary="It's a demographic shift."}}
315 **Claim:** White replacement is just a natural demographic change.
316
317 **Rebuttal:**
318 * Deliberate government policy is driving this shift, not random chance.
319 * Calling genocide a “shift” is a rhetorical trick to normalize it.
320 * No one describes other genocides as mere “demographics.”
321
322 **Explanation:**
323 Labeling White genocide as “demographic change” hides intent. Forced immigration and assimilation are policies, not accidents. Euphemisms cannot erase the fact that deliberate engineering of population destruction is genocide.
324 {{/expandable}}
325
326 {{expandable summary="They just need to assimilate."}}
327 **Claim:** Non-Whites can simply assimilate into White societies.
328
329 **Rebuttal:**
330 * Assimilation is often code for intermarriage, which eliminates Whites genetically.
331 * “Acting White” is not the same as being White.
332 * Large numbers of non-Whites inevitably bring their own group identities and behaviors.
333
334 **Explanation:**
335 The idea of assimilation is flawed. Cultural mimicry does not change biological identity, and mass assimilation into Whites means no Whites remain. This is erasure disguised as tolerance.
336 {{/expandable}}
337
338 {{expandable summary="The brown future is inevitable."}}
339 **Claim:** White replacement is unavoidable, so resistance is pointless.
340
341 **Rebuttal:**
342 * Declaring inevitability is a psychological tactic to demoralize resistance.
343 * History is full of “inevitable” predictions proven wrong (Communism, EU integration, etc.).
344 * The claim admits openly that replacement is intentional.
345
346 **Explanation:**
347 Telling Whites their elimination is “inevitable” is both an admission and a propaganda tactic. Nothing in history is inevitable when people resist. Predictions of inevitability are political weapons, not truths.
348 {{/expandable}}
349
350 {{expandable summary="Diversity is our strength."}}
351 **Claim:** Diversity inherently strengthens societies.
352
353 **Rebuttal:**
354 * Diversity is only forced on White nations, never others.
355 * Homogeneity produces the highest trust and cooperation levels.
356 * Every example of diversity leads to fragmentation and conflict.
357
358 **Explanation:**
359 The slogan “diversity is our strength” is propaganda. No evidence supports it; in fact, the opposite is true. High-trust societies are homogeneous, while diverse societies fracture. Diversity weakens unity, it does not strengthen it.
360 {{/expandable}}
361
362 {{expandable summary="Race is a social construct."}}
363 **Claim:** Race does not exist biologically, only socially.
364
365 **Rebuttal:**
366 * Genetics show clear, measurable differences between groups.
367 * If race did not exist, accusations against Whites for slavery or colonialism would be meaningless.
368 * Anti-Whites contradict themselves by saying race is fake but Whites are uniquely guilty.
369
370 **Explanation:**
371 Race denial is a contradiction. Biological differences are real and documented. The claim “race doesn’t exist” is selectively used to erase Whites, while still blaming them collectively for history. That hypocrisy exposes its true purpose.
372 {{/expandable}}
373
374 {{expandable summary="We all came from Africa."}}
375 **Claim:** Common African origins make racial distinctions meaningless.
376
377 **Rebuttal:**
378 * Shared distant origins do not erase present distinctions.
379 * This logic could excuse any genocide by saying “we’re all from the same place.”
380 * Differences that matter now remain, regardless of ancient history.
381
382 **Explanation:**
383 Appealing to origins in Africa is another rhetorical trick. If all groups come from Africa, why is this only used against Whites? Distinctions exist today and define real peoples. Past migrations don’t erase present identities.
384 {{/expandable}}
385
386 {{expandable summary="Immigration is good for the economy."}}
387 **Claim:** Immigration benefits the economy, so it must be positive.
388
389 **Rebuttal:**
390 * Economic benefit does not justify genocide.
391 * If immigration were so beneficial, non-White countries would be wealthy.
392 * Long-term costs (crime, welfare, division) outweigh temporary gains.
393
394 **Explanation:**
395 Reducing survival to economics is immoral. A people’s existence cannot be measured in GDP points. Even if immigration boosted some metrics, it would not justify policies that destroy a people.
396 {{/expandable}}
397
398 {{expandable summary="You're just a Nazi fascist racist bigot supremacist."}}
399 **Claim:** Anyone defending Whites is simply hateful and extremist.
400
401 **Rebuttal:**
402 * These are slurs used to silence dissent.
403 * None of these labels address the actual argument.
404 * Name-calling replaces debate when anti-Whites have no evidence.
405
406 **Explanation:**
407 Slurs like “racist” and “Nazi” are used to shut down discussion, not to refute facts. They are emotional weapons of censorship. Their overuse shows weakness, not strength, in the anti-White position.
408 {{/expandable}}
409
410 {{expandable summary="You invaded America and Australia, now you complain about invasion?"}}
411 **Claim:** Whites cannot oppose immigration because they colonized in the past.
412
413 **Rebuttal:**
414 * Every race has conquered land — not just Whites.
415 * Past conquest does not justify genocide today.
416 * By this logic, every people should be destroyed, which is absurd.
417
418 **Explanation:**
419 “Whites invaded” is not a valid justification for erasing Whites now. All races have expanded and conquered. Only Whites are uniquely told their past delegitimizes their present. This exposes the argument as anti-White propaganda, not principle.
420 {{/expandable}}
421
422 {{expandable summary="Would Christ turn away sufferers?"}}
423 **Claim:**It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
424 **Rebuttal:**
425 * Aren't Jews Gods chosen people? Didn't he give them Israel?
426 * If these people are suffering and they are hardworking decent people, wouldn't it cause more suffering to take them away from the countries that need help the most?
427
428 **Explanation:**
429 God himself separated the races at the Tower of Babel and clearly designed us with different features. So not only does it do more harm than good by allowing ourselves to be demographically swamped and die out, it accomplishes nothing. Non white nations will be worse off with us gone, not better off.
430 {{/expandable}}
431
432 {{expandable summary="White privilege is unfair."}}
433 **Claim:** Whites deserve whats happening because of their privilege.
434 **Rebuttal:**
435 *This isn't even true, whites are the most attacked group in America and aren't allowed any advocacies.
436 *Even if it were true, it wouldn't justify us dying out
437 *If this was true, it would only apply to White countries. Do you think asians dont have Asian privilege in Asian countries?
438 **Explanation:**
439 If whites have privilege it doesn’t justify white genocide.
440 {{/expandable}}
441
442 {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
443 Claim: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
444 Rebuttal:
445
446 Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
447
448 Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
449
450 A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
451 Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
452 {{/expandable}}
453
454 {{expandable summary="“For votes” doesn’t justify genocidal policies."}}
455 Claim: Vote-getting justifies demographic policies.
456 Rebuttal:
457
458 A vote motive does not excuse replacement or dispossession.
459
460 No political system is legitimate if it requires destroying its founding people.
461
462 Claiming “votes” is a distraction from the reality of demographic attack.
463 Explanation: Political expediency is not a moral shield. Policies leading to White decline remain genocidal regardless of intent.
464 {{/expandable}}
465
466 {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
467 Claim: Whites stole America.
468 Rebuttal:
469
470 All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
471
472 Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
473
474 Calling White conquest “theft” implies illegitimacy, but never applies that label to non-Whites doing the same.
475 Explanation: If conquest voids legitimacy, then no nation or people can claim land. Singling out Whites is hypocrisy.
476 {{/expandable}}
477
478 {{expandable summary="Contradictory anti-White logic on land and borders."}}
479 Claim: Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
480 Rebuttal:
481
482 If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
483
484 If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
485
486 Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
487 Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
488 {{/expandable}}
489
490 {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
491 Claim: Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
492 Rebuttal:
493
494 Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
495
496 Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
497
498 If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
499 Explanation: History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
500 {{/expandable}}
501
502 {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
503 Claim: Whites stole America.
504 Rebuttal:
505
506 If Whites stole it, then it is by definition a White country now.
507
508 Diversity did not “steal” America; conquest and settlement did.
509
510 The rhetoric inadvertently admits the truth of ownership and establishment.
511 Explanation: To claim theft is to admit transfer of possession. By their own words, America is a White nation.
512 {{/expandable}}
513
514 {{expandable summary="If America was stolen, leave it."}}
515 Claim: America was stolen from Indians.
516 Rebuttal:
517
518 If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
519
520 Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
521
522 Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
523 Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
524 {{/expandable}}
525
526 {{expandable summary="Welfare argument is irrelevant."}}
527 Claim: Most people on welfare are White.
528 Rebuttal:
529
530 Welfare statistics do not justify demographic replacement.
531
532 Whites paying into the system far exceed non-Whites, meaning redistribution favors others.
533
534 Poverty does not make a people disposable.
535 Explanation: Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
536 {{/expandable}}
537
538 {{expandable summary="Whites have no culture."}}
539 Claim: Whites have no culture.
540 Rebuttal:
541
542 Western civilization is one of the richest cultural traditions in history.
543
544 Claiming a people “doesn’t exist” is a known genocidal tactic.
545
546 Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
547 Explanation: Delegitimizing culture is psychological warfare. It is proof of genocidal intent.
548 {{/expandable}}
549
550 {{expandable summary="Globalists vs White genocide."}}
551 Claim: Globalists are the real enemy, focus on them.
552 Rebuttal:
553
554 Globalists are dangerous, but they target Whites specifically for elimination.
555
556 White nations must first secure survival before joining broader struggles.
557
558 Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide.
559 Explanation: Global battles cannot be fought if Whites are erased. Survival comes before coalition.
560 {{/expandable}}
561
562 {{expandable summary="Europe is the White homeland."}}
563 Claim: Whites must go back to Europe.
564 Rebuttal:
565
566 By that logic, all non-Whites should leave Europe.
567
568 Should Turks leave Constantinople? Should Bantus vacate southern Africa? Should tribes vacate lands they conquered?
569
570 Conquest and migration are universal; only Whites are told to leave.
571 Explanation: The “go back” demand is not about fairness, but about dispossessing Whites uniquely.
572 {{/expandable}}
573
574 {{expandable summary="Conquest is consistent across races."}}
575 Claim: Whites stole land, unlike others.
576 Rebuttal:
577
578 Turks stole Constantinople from Whites.
579
580 Bantus stole southern Africa from Capoids.
581
582 Ojibwe stole from Lakota, who stole from others.
583 Explanation: Conquest is universal. Singling out Whites exposes bias, not principle.
584 {{/expandable}}