Skip to Content
0 Votes

Wiki source code of Common Myths

Version 29.1 by Ryan C on 2025/08/17 23:34
Hide last authors
Ryan C 19.1 1 {{success}}
2 These drop down style arguments are done using the expandable macro. Simply edit the page and type /expandable (it will open a selection box)
3 {{/success}}
Ryan C 12.1 4
Ryan C 14.1 5 {{expandable summary="We will all become one uniform Mixed Race"}}
6 Claim: Over time, humanity will homogenize into one race of mixed-race individuals due to globalization and intermixing.
7
8 Rebuttal:
9
10 Blending into one race assumes uniform mixing across all populations, which is unlikely due to societal, cultural, and geographical barriers.
11 Historical evidence shows that distinct ethnic groups have maintained separate identities for millennia despite some intermixing.
12 High birth rates among certain populations mean some ethnic groups will likely persist as dominant demographics in specific regions.
13 Explanation: The idea that humanity will blend into one homogenous race oversimplifies the reality of demographic trends. Different populations have maintained their distinct identities for centuries, even under conditions of migration and intermixing. For example, despite centuries of migration into Europe, distinct ethnicities like the Basques or Sami people still exist. Additionally, demographic trends show that fertility rates vary significantly across groups, meaning some populations grow faster than others. For instance, many African and Middle Eastern countries have much higher birth rates than Europe or East Asia, making a global "blending" implausible. Societies naturally form cultural and ethnic distinctions, even when migration occurs
Ryan C 20.1 14
15 [[See also: White Genocide for statistics on this>>doc:Main Categories.Race.White Genocide.WebHome]]
Ryan C 14.1 16 {{/expandable}}
17
Ryan C 16.1 18 {{expandable summary="There is no discrimination against White people"}}
Ryan C 10.1 19 **Claim:** DEI is necessary to address historical inequities and does not disadvantage white men.
20
21 **Rebuttal:**
22
23 * DEI initiatives often include hiring quotas or preferences that explicitly exclude white men, creating new forms of systemic bias.
24 * Surveys and anecdotal evidence show that many companies deprioritize white male candidates to meet diversity metrics.
25 * Addressing historical inequities doesn’t justify creating new disparities, particularly when these policies fail to account for merit.
26
27 **Explanation:** This defense of DEI initiatives ignores the tangible harm they cause to individuals. I point to real-world examples where DEI policies lead to explicit discrimination. Companies like Coca-Cola have implemented training programs encouraging employees to "be less white," and countless hiring managers admit they deprioritize white male candidates to meet diversity quotas. These policies often overlook merit and qualifications, instead prioritizing characteristics like race or gender. While addressing historical inequities seems a noble goal, creating new inequalities that disadvantage people today doesn’t solve past injustices—it only shifts the harm to a new group.
Ryan C 16.1 28 {{/expandable}}
Ryan C 10.1 29
Ryan C 16.1 30 {{expandable summary="IQ disparities across groups are entirely due to environment"}}
Ryan C 10.1 31 **Claim:** Differences in IQ between groups are solely the result of environmental factors, dismissing any genetic contribution.
32
Ryan C 12.1 33 ## Relevant Studies##
Ryan C 10.1 34
Ryan C 22.1 35 * [[Rushton2005>>attach:Main Categories.Science & Research.Research at a Glance.Studies\: IQ.WebHome@rushton2005 OCR.pdf]]
Ryan C 10.1 36
37 **Rebuttal:**
38
39 * While environmental factors (e.g., nutrition, education) influence IQ, genetic factors also play a significant role in group differences.
40 * The Flynn Effect demonstrates rising IQs over time due to environmental improvements, but it does not negate underlying genetic differences.
41 * Studies consistently show both genetic and environmental contributions to IQ, and ignoring one oversimplifies the issue.
42
Ryan C 22.2 43 **Explanation:** While environmental factors such as better nutrition and education do affect IQ, they don’t fully explain group differences. For instance, the Flynn Effect shows that average IQs have risen globally due to environmental improvements, but group differences remain consistent. Genetics play a significant role alongside the environment. Studies on twins, for example, demonstrate that IQ is highly heritable. Ignoring this fact in favor of a purely environmental explanation is intellectually dishonest. It’s not about dismissing environmental factors but about acknowledging the complex interplay of genetics and environment in shaping intelligence.
Ryan C 10.1 44
Ryan C 22.3 45
Ryan C 16.1 46 {{/expandable}}
Ryan C 10.1 47
Ryan C 16.1 48 {{expandable summary="Culture is what matters not race"}}
Ryan C 10.1 49 **Claim**: Shared ancestry among Europeans is irrelevant to their cultural unity.
50
51 **Rebuttal**:
52
53 * Shared ancestry provides a foundation for common values, language development, and traditions.
54 * Historical cooperation among European groups shows the importance of shared ancestry in forming alliances and cultural bonds.
55 * Genetic studies reveal that Europeans share significant ancestry, reinforcing their cultural cohesion.
56
57 **Explanation**:
58
59 Shared ancestry isn’t just a biological fact but a cultural cornerstone. For instance, European nations have historically formed alliances based on shared ethnic and cultural identities. Language families like the Indo-European group stem from this common ancestry, creating linguistic and cultural links across nations. Ignoring this connection overlooks a key factor in how civilizations form cohesive identities over time. Shared ancestry provides the framework upon which shared values and traditions are built, making it integral to cultural unity.
Ryan C 16.1 60 {{/expandable}}
61
Ryan C 28.1 62 {{expandable summary="You just hate people who don't look like you."}}
Ryan C 24.1 63 **Claim:** Advocacy for Whites is rooted in hatred toward other races.
64
65 **Rebuttal:**
66 * If hatred were the goal, it would involve destroying other races, not defending one’s own.
67 * It is White people being targeted with demographic flooding, not others.
68 * Preservation of one’s group is not equivalent to hate for others.
69
70 **Explanation:**
71 Saying “you just hate people who don’t look like you” is a strawman. White advocates are not asking for the destruction of others, but for the right of their own group to survive. True hatred would look like conquest or erasure of others. The reality is that anti-White policies are creating conditions that erase Whites, and pointing that out is survival, not hate.
72 {{/expandable}}
73
74 {{expandable summary="We don’t demand that the whole world be white."}}
75 **Claim:** Whites demand that everyone assimilate into whiteness.
76
77 **Rebuttal:**
78 * Whites are not demanding the elimination of other peoples.
79 * It is anti-Whites who demand that every White nation becomes non-White.
80 * The double standard exposes who is really forcing assimilation.
81
82 **Explanation:**
83 White advocacy is about preservation, not conquest. Anti-Whites constantly invert the accusation, pretending that Whites want the whole world to be White, when in reality Whites only ask for the right to maintain their own homelands and identity. The demand for a non-White world is entirely one-sided.
84 {{/expandable}}
85
86 {{expandable summary="No one's forcing assimilation."}}
87 **Claim:** Intermixing happens voluntarily, not by force.
88
89 **Rebuttal:**
90 * White communities are denied the freedom to remain White-only.
91 * Legal, cultural, and economic pressure enforces forced integration.
92 * UN law defines genocide as including coerced conditions of destruction.
93
94 **Explanation:**
95 The argument that “no one’s forcing” ignores the reality: every White nation is pressured through laws, policies, and propaganda to accept mass immigration and assimilation. Under UN Resolution 260, deliberately creating conditions that erase a people is genocide, regardless of whether it involves direct violence.
96 {{/expandable}}
97
98 {{expandable summary="Have more babies."}}
99 **Claim:** Whites can solve the problem of replacement by reproducing more.
100
101 **Rebuttal:**
102 * Telling one group to “breed or die” while enforcing policies that erase them is genocidal.
103 * Declining fertility does not justify importing tens of millions of non-Whites.
104 * The argument itself admits that genocidal conditions are in place.
105
106 **Explanation:**
107 Birth rates fluctuate throughout history, but no other people is told their fertility justifies their eradication. Whites are uniquely targeted with policies that replace them under the excuse of “low birth rates.” This reveals genocidal intent.
108 {{/expandable}}
109
110 {{expandable summary="America is a nation of immigrants."}}
111 **Claim:** America is uniquely a “nation of immigrants,” so mass migration today is natural.
112
113 **Rebuttal:**
114 * Every nation has ancestors who came from elsewhere. That does not erase national identity.
115 * Immigration is not unique to America and does not justify replacement of the founding stock.
116 * The phrase is used selectively to push anti-White policies.
117
118 **Explanation:**
119 Saying America is a “nation of immigrants” is rhetorical sleight of hand. It ignores that every people originated somewhere. What matters is who founded and built the country. Immigration today is not the same as nation-building, and it does not justify White genocide.
120 {{/expandable}}
121
122 {{expandable summary="Stop trying to divide us."}}
123 **Claim:** Talking about race is what creates division.
124
125 **Rebuttal:**
126 * Multiracial societies are inherently divided along racial lines.
127 * Those who flood White countries with mass immigration are responsible for division.
128 * The more diversity, the more racial politics dominates.
129
130 **Explanation:**
131 Blaming Whites for “division” reverses cause and effect. Division arises because diversity is imposed on Whites against their will. Every multiracial society demonstrates that racial conflict is inevitable when groups with competing interests are forced together.
132 {{/expandable}}
133
134 {{expandable summary="Identity politics is the problem."}}
135 **Claim:** Political conflict comes from identity politics, not immigration.
136
137 **Rebuttal:**
138 * All politics in multiracial countries becomes identity politics.
139 * Non-Whites are loyal to their groups; only Whites are told not to be.
140 * Diversity is what drives identity politics.
141
142 **Explanation:**
143 It is dishonest to blame identity politics itself, while ignoring the cause: forced diversity. When you mix peoples with different interests, politics becomes tribal. Whites are singled out as the only group forbidden to defend themselves while everyone else is encouraged to practice group loyalty.
144 {{/expandable}}
145
146 {{expandable summary="Hate speech is not free speech."}}
147 **Claim:** Restricting “hate speech” protects society.
148
149 **Rebuttal:**
150 * Every tyranny justifies censorship by labeling dissent as dangerous.
151 * The current anti-White system censors truth under the guise of “hate.”
152 * Free speech protections were meant for unpopular opinions, not state-approved ones.
153
154 **Explanation:**
155 Calling speech “hate” is a tool of repression. It is not about safety, but about silencing opposition to anti-White policies. Censorship is always framed as moral, but its effect is to protect the reigning power and punish dissent.
156 {{/expandable}}
157
158 {{expandable summary="One brown person down the street isn't genocide."}}
159 **Claim:** Genocide is exaggerated because a single non-White doesn’t constitute a threat.
160
161 **Rebuttal:**
162 * No one argues that one person equals genocide.
163 * The issue is mass immigration plus forced assimilation in every White country.
164 * Strawman arguments are used to distract from the real claim.
165
166 **Explanation:**
167 Anti-Whites misrepresent the position deliberately. The argument is not about individuals but about demographic replacement through policy. Under international law, coordinated replacement policies meet the definition of genocide. Pretending it’s about “one person” is dishonest deflection.
168 {{/expandable}}
169
170 {{expandable summary="Genocide means killing. Whites aren't being killed."}}
171 **Claim:** Genocide only applies to physical mass killings.
172
173 **Rebuttal:**
174 * UN law defines genocide to include deliberate conditions of destruction, not just killing.
175 * Forced assimilation and mass immigration fall under this definition.
176 * Historical precedent (Raphael Lemkin’s definition) explicitly included non-lethal methods.
177
178 **Explanation:**
179 Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
180 {{/expandable}}
181
Ryan C 29.1 182 {{expandable summary="No one's chasing you down."}}
183 **Claim:** Whites can still live separately if they choose.
Ryan C 24.1 184
Ryan C 29.1 185 **Rebuttal:**
186 * Any attempt by Whites to form their own communities is targeted and dismantled.
187 * Segregation laws and “anti-discrimination” policies prevent White-only spaces.
188 * Whites uniquely are not allowed to escape enforced diversity.
189
190 **Explanation:**
191 While other groups can live together, any White attempt to do the same is criminalized or attacked. From zoning restrictions to lawsuits, the message is clear: no escape from “diversity.” That is coercion.
192 {{/expandable}}
193
194 {{expandable summary="We all came from a common ancestor."}}
195 **Claim:** Since all humans share a common ancestor, race is irrelevant.
196
197 **Rebuttal:**
198 * Shared origins do not justify present-day eradication.
199 * By this logic, any genocide could be excused by tracing ancestry back far enough.
200 * Distinctions between groups are real and present, regardless of ultimate origin.
201
202 **Explanation:**
203 Appealing to a “common ancestor” is not an argument against genocide. Every living creature has a distant common origin, but that does not negate the rights of distinct groups to exist today. Using this argument selectively against Whites is dishonest.
204 {{/expandable}}
205
206 {{expandable summary="You're inbred."}}
207 **Claim:** Whites are genetically damaged due to inbreeding.
208
209 **Rebuttal:**
210 * Every subspecies, breed, and race arises from mutations and selective in-group reproduction.
211 * Inbreeding accusations are never used as a justification for eliminating other groups.
212 * Whites number in the hundreds of millions — the idea they are “inbred” is absurd.
213
214 **Explanation:**
215 “Inbred” is a smear, not a scientific argument. All populations display in-group reproduction at some stage. Yet only Whites are told this somehow justifies their elimination. The accusation is propaganda, not biology.
216 {{/expandable}}
217
218 {{expandable summary="You can't control who people love."}}
219 **Claim:** Intermarriage is only about free choice and love.
220
221 **Rebuttal:**
222 * Mass immigration plus forced assimilation ensures intermarriage happens under engineered conditions.
223 * Love is not an argument for demographic replacement programs.
224 * Claiming “love” as justification ignores the coercive context of White erasure.
225
226 **Explanation:**
227 If an individual cannot find a partner within their own billion-strong population, that is a personal issue, not a justification for policies that eliminate an entire race. To pretend the White genocide program is “just love” is absurd.
228 {{/expandable}}
229
230 {{expandable summary="I can't be anti-White. I'm White."}}
231 **Claim:** Whites cannot be anti-White.
232
233 **Rebuttal:**
234 * Betrayal is possible within any group — traitors have existed in every nation.
235 * Being White does not exempt one from enacting anti-White policies.
236 * Many Whites are incentivized to oppose their own group through social and financial pressure.
237
238 **Explanation:**
239 Claiming identity shields one from betrayal is nonsensical. A White person who works to dismantle White survival is still anti-White. By definition, that is treachery.
240 {{/expandable}}
241
242 {{expandable summary="Go back to Europe."}}
243 **Claim:** Whites in America should return to Europe.
244
245 **Rebuttal:**
246 * Europe is also being flooded with non-Whites.
247 * Every nation was founded by conquest — if Whites must “go back,” then all other groups must as well.
248 * Telling Whites to leave their own creation is hypocrisy.
249
250 **Explanation:**
251 If hating Japanese doesn’t mean leaving Japan, and hating Blacks doesn’t mean leaving Africa, then hating Whites doesn’t mean they must leave America. Whites built these nations; they have as much right to remain as anyone.
252 {{/expandable}}
253
254 {{expandable summary="America was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal."}}
255 **Claim:** America’s founding documents establish universal equality.
256
257 **Rebuttal:**
258 * The Declaration of Independence was wartime propaganda aimed at Europe.
259 * The U.S. Constitution — the actual founding law — makes no mention of equality.
260 * The stated purpose of America is securing liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.”
261
262 **Explanation:**
263 America’s real foundation is not abstract equality but the preservation of its people. The Constitution’s preamble is explicit about posterity. Claiming universal equality as the founding purpose is revisionism.
264 {{/expandable}}
265
266 {{expandable summary="It's our values that matter."}}
267 **Claim:** Shared values, not shared ancestry, define civilization.
268
269 **Rebuttal:**
270 * Values arise from the genetic and cultural foundations of a people.
271 * Remove the people, and the values eventually collapse.
272 * No people can outsource their civilization without destroying it.
273
274 **Explanation:**
275 Civilization is a racial construct. White values come from the White gene pool. If White people vanish, so do their values. Pretending values float independently of people is naïve.
276 {{/expandable}}
277
278 {{expandable summary="It's 2018! The White population is growing so there can't be a White genocide."}}
279 **Claim:** Whites are not disappearing, so genocide claims are exaggerated.
280
281 **Rebuttal:**
282 * Anti-Whites admit they push immigration because Whites “aren’t having enough children.”
283 * Genocide is defined by the attempt, not just the final outcome.
284 * Attempted genocide is still genocide under UN law.
285
286 **Explanation:**
287 Whites may not yet be fully eliminated, but the policies are in place and openly defended. Attempted genocide is still a crime, and demographic replacement shows clear intent.
288 {{/expandable}}
289
290 {{expandable summary="We know what your kind of talk led to in the 30's."}}
291 **Claim:** Discussing White survival inevitably leads to another Holocaust.
292
293 **Rebuttal:**
294 * No historical event justifies genocide against Whites today.
295 * If past atrocities justified elimination, then Turks, Japanese, and countless others would also be targeted.
296 * The argument is selective and hypocritical.
297
298 **Explanation:**
299 Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
300 {{/expandable}}
301