Changes for page Common Arguments

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -70,22 +70,9 @@
70	70	* Preservation of one’s group is not equivalent to hate for others.
71	71
72	72	**Explanation:**
73		-Saying “you just hate people who don’t look like you” is a strawman. White advocates are not asking for the destruction of others, but for the right of their own group to survive. True hatred would look like conquest or erasure of others. The reality is that anti-White policies are creating conditions that erase Whites, and pointing that out is survival, not hate.
	73	+Saying “you just hate people who don’t look like you” is a strawman. White advocates are not asking for the destruction of others, but for the right of their own group to survive. True hatred would look like conquest or erasure of others. The reality is that anti-White policies are creating conditions that erase Whites, and pointing that out is survival, not hate. We don’t demand that the whole world be white. White advocacy is about preservation, not conquest. Anti-Whites constantly invert the accusation, pretending that Whites want the whole world to be White, when in reality Whites only ask for the right to maintain their own homelands and identity. The demand for a non-White world is entirely one-sided.
74	74	{{/expandable}}
75	75
76		-{{expandable summary="We don’t demand that the whole world be white."}}
77		-**Claim:** Whites demand that everyone assimilate into whiteness.
78		-
79		-**Rebuttal:**
80		-
81		-* Whites are not demanding the elimination of other peoples.
82		-* It is anti-Whites who demand that every White nation becomes non-White.
83		-* The double standard exposes who is really forcing assimilation.
84		-
85		-**Explanation:**
86		-White advocacy is about preservation, not conquest. Anti-Whites constantly invert the accusation, pretending that Whites want the whole world to be White, when in reality Whites only ask for the right to maintain their own homelands and identity. The demand for a non-White world is entirely one-sided.
87		-{{/expandable}}
88		-
89	89	{{expandable summary="No one's forcing assimilation."}}
90	90	**Claim:** Intermixing happens voluntarily, not by force.
91	91
...	...	@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
109	109	* The argument itself admits that genocidal conditions are in place.
110	110
111	111	**Explanation:**
112		-Birth rates fluctuate throughout history, but no other people is told their fertility justifies their eradication. Whites are uniquely targeted with policies that replace them under the excuse of “low birth rates.” This reveals genocidal intent.
	99	+Birth rates fluctuate throughout history, but no other people is told their fertility justifies their eradication. Whites are uniquely targeted with policies that replace them under the excuse of “low birth rates.” If whites are forced into a breeding contest in their own homelands to survive you’re admitting that genocidal policies are in place. White birth rates don’t justify genocidal policies aimed at getting rid of one race, the white race.
113	113	{{/expandable}}
114	114
115	115	{{expandable summary="America is a nation of immigrants."}}