Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 31.6 to 31.5 From 33.1 to 32.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 01:00

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:58

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -475,12 +475,11 @@
  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
  **Rebuttal:**
++Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
++Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
--* Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
--* Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
--* A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
--
--**Explanation:** Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
++A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
++Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
@@ -500,10 +500,9 @@
  * If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
  * If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
--* Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
--**Explanation:**
--This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
++Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
++Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
@@ -510,12 +510,12 @@
  **Claim: **Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
  **Rebuttal:**
--* Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
--* Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
--* If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
++Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
--**Explanation: **
--History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
++Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
++
++If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
++Explanation: History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
@@ -536,9 +536,9 @@
  * If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
  * Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
--* Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
  **Explanation:**
++Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
  Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
  {{/expandable}}
@@ -548,11 +548,9 @@
  * Welfare statistics do not justify demographic replacement.
  * Whites paying into the system far exceed non-Whites, meaning redistribution favors others.
--* Poverty does not make a people disposable.
--
--**Explanation:**
--Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
++Poverty does not make a people disposable.
++Explanation: Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Whites have no culture."}}
@@ -561,9 +561,9 @@
  * Western civilization is one of the richest cultural traditions in history.
  * Claiming a people “doesn’t exist” is a known genocidal tactic.
--* Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
  **Explanation:**
++Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
  Explanation: Delegitimizing culture is psychological warfare. It is proof of genocidal intent.
  {{/expandable}}
@@ -573,9 +573,9 @@
  * Globalists are dangerous, but they target Whites specifically for elimination.
  * White nations must first secure survival before joining broader struggles.
--* Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide
  **Explanation:**
++Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide.
  Explanation: Global battles cannot be fought if Whites are erased. Survival comes before coalition.
  {{/expandable}}