Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13
From version 31.9
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 31.7
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -475,12 +475,11 @@
475 475  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
476 476  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
477 477  **Rebuttal:**
478 +Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
479 +Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
478 478  
479 -* Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
480 -* Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
481 -* A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 -
483 -**Explanation:** Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
481 +A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 +Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
484 484  {{/expandable}}
485 485  
486 486  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
... ... @@ -500,10 +500,9 @@
500 500  
501 501  * If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
502 502  * If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
503 -* Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
504 504  
505 -**Explanation:**
506 -This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
503 +Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
504 +Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
507 507  {{/expandable}}
508 508  
509 509  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
... ... @@ -514,8 +514,7 @@
514 514  * Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
515 515  * If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
516 516  
517 -**Explanation: **
518 -History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
515 +**Explanation:**History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
519 519  {{/expandable}}
520 520  
521 521  {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
... ... @@ -536,10 +536,10 @@
536 536  
537 537  * If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
538 538  * Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
539 -* Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
540 540  
541 541  **Explanation:**
542 -\\Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
538 +Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
539 +Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
543 543  {{/expandable}}
544 544  
545 545  {{expandable summary="Welfare argument is irrelevant."}}