Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13
From version 31.7
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 33.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 01:01
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -3,13 +3,14 @@
3 3  {{/success}}
4 4  
5 5  {{expandable summary="We will all become one uniform Mixed Race"}}
6 -Claim: Over time, humanity will homogenize into one race of mixed-race individuals due to globalization and intermixing.
6 +**Claim: **Over time, humanity will homogenize into one race of mixed-race individuals due to globalization and intermixing.
7 7  
8 -Rebuttal:
8 +**Rebuttal:**
9 9  
10 -Blending into one race assumes uniform mixing across all populations, which is unlikely due to societal, cultural, and geographical barriers.
11 -Historical evidence shows that distinct ethnic groups have maintained separate identities for millennia despite some intermixing.
12 -High birth rates among certain populations mean some ethnic groups will likely persist as dominant demographics in specific regions.
10 +* Blending into one race assumes uniform mixing across all populations, which is unlikely due to societal, cultural, and geographical barriers.
11 +* Historical evidence shows that distinct ethnic groups have maintained separate identities for millennia despite some intermixing.
12 +* High birth rates among certain populations mean some ethnic groups will likely persist as dominant demographics in specific regions.
13 +
13 13  Explanation: The idea that humanity will blend into one homogenous race oversimplifies the reality of demographic trends. Different populations have maintained their distinct identities for centuries, even under conditions of migration and intermixing. For example, despite centuries of migration into Europe, distinct ethnicities like the Basques or Sami people still exist. Additionally, demographic trends show that fertility rates vary significantly across groups, meaning some populations grow faster than others. For instance, many African and Middle Eastern countries have much higher birth rates than Europe or East Asia, making a global "blending" implausible. Societies naturally form cultural and ethnic distinctions, even when migration occurs
14 14  
15 15  [[See also: White Genocide for statistics on this>>doc:Main Categories.Race.White Genocide.WebHome]]
... ... @@ -475,11 +475,12 @@
475 475  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
476 476  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
477 477  **Rebuttal:**
478 -Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
479 -Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
480 480  
481 -A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 -Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
480 +* Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
481 +* Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
482 +* A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
483 +
484 +**Explanation:** Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
483 483  {{/expandable}}
484 484  
485 485  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
... ... @@ -499,9 +499,10 @@
499 499  
500 500  * If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
501 501  * If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
504 +* Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
502 502  
503 -Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
504 -Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
506 +**Explanation:**
507 +This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
505 505  {{/expandable}}
506 506  
507 507  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
... ... @@ -512,7 +512,8 @@
512 512  * Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
513 513  * If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
514 514  
515 -**Explanation:**History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
518 +**Explanation: **
519 +History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
516 516  {{/expandable}}
517 517  
518 518  {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
... ... @@ -533,9 +533,9 @@
533 533  
534 534  * If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
535 535  * Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
540 +* Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
536 536  
537 537  **Explanation:**
538 -Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
539 539  Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
540 540  {{/expandable}}
541 541  
... ... @@ -545,9 +545,10 @@
545 545  
546 546  * Welfare statistics do not justify demographic replacement.
547 547  * Whites paying into the system far exceed non-Whites, meaning redistribution favors others.
552 +* Poverty does not make a people disposable.
548 548  
549 -Poverty does not make a people disposable.
550 -Explanation: Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
554 +**Explanation:**
555 +Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
551 551  {{/expandable}}
552 552  
553 553  {{expandable summary="Whites have no culture."}}
... ... @@ -556,9 +556,9 @@
556 556  
557 557  * Western civilization is one of the richest cultural traditions in history.
558 558  * Claiming a people “doesn’t exist” is a known genocidal tactic.
564 +* Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
559 559  
560 560  **Explanation:**
561 -Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
562 562  Explanation: Delegitimizing culture is psychological warfare. It is proof of genocidal intent.
563 563  {{/expandable}}
564 564  
... ... @@ -568,9 +568,9 @@
568 568  
569 569  * Globalists are dangerous, but they target Whites specifically for elimination.
570 570  * White nations must first secure survival before joining broader struggles.
576 +* Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide
571 571  
572 572  **Explanation:**
573 -Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide.
574 574  Explanation: Global battles cannot be fought if Whites are erased. Survival comes before coalition.
575 575  {{/expandable}}
576 576