Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13
From version 31.7
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 31.9
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -475,11 +475,12 @@
475 475  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
476 476  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
477 477  **Rebuttal:**
478 -Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
479 -Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
480 480  
481 -A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 -Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
479 +* Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
480 +* Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
481 +* A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 +
483 +**Explanation:** Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
483 483  {{/expandable}}
484 484  
485 485  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
... ... @@ -499,9 +499,10 @@
499 499  
500 500  * If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
501 501  * If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
503 +* Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
502 502  
503 -Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
504 -Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
505 +**Explanation:**
506 +This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
505 505  {{/expandable}}
506 506  
507 507  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
... ... @@ -512,7 +512,8 @@
512 512  * Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
513 513  * If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
514 514  
515 -**Explanation:**History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
517 +**Explanation: **
518 +History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
516 516  {{/expandable}}
517 517  
518 518  {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
... ... @@ -533,10 +533,10 @@
533 533  
534 534  * If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
535 535  * Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
539 +* Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
536 536  
537 537  **Explanation:**
538 -Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
539 -Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
542 +\\Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
540 540  {{/expandable}}
541 541  
542 542  {{expandable summary="Welfare argument is irrelevant."}}