Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13
From version 31.6
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 31.8
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -475,11 +475,12 @@
475 475  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
476 476  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
477 477  **Rebuttal:**
478 -Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
479 -Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
480 480  
481 -A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 -Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
479 +* Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
480 +* Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
481 +* A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 +
483 +**Explanation:** Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
483 483  {{/expandable}}
484 484  
485 485  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
... ... @@ -499,9 +499,10 @@
499 499  
500 500  * If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
501 501  * If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
503 +* Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
502 502  
503 -Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
504 -Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
505 +**Explanation:**
506 +This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
505 505  {{/expandable}}
506 506  
507 507  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
... ... @@ -508,12 +508,12 @@
508 508  **Claim: **Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
509 509  **Rebuttal:**
510 510  
511 -Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
513 +* Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
514 +* Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
515 +* If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
512 512  
513 -Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
514 -
515 -If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
516 -Explanation: History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
517 +**Explanation: **
518 +History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
517 517  {{/expandable}}
518 518  
519 519  {{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
... ... @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@
536 536  * Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
537 537  
538 538  **Explanation:**
539 -Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
541 +​​​​​​​
540 540  Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
541 541  {{/expandable}}
542 542