Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13
From version 31.3
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 31.2
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:52
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
450 450  {{/expandable}}
451 451  
452 452  {{expandable summary="Would Christ turn away sufferers?"}}
453 -**Claim: **It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
453 +**Claim:**It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
454 454  **Rebuttal:**
455 455  
456 456  * Aren't Jews Gods chosen people? Didn't he give them Israel?
... ... @@ -475,42 +475,57 @@
475 475  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
476 476  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
477 477  **Rebuttal:**
478 -Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
479 -Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
478 +*Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
479 +*Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
480 480  
481 481  A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
482 482  Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
483 483  {{/expandable}}
484 484  
485 +{{expandable summary="“For votes” doesn’t justify genocidal policies."}}
486 +Claim: Vote-getting justifies demographic policies.
487 +Rebuttal:
488 +
489 +A vote motive does not excuse replacement or dispossession.
490 +
491 +No political system is legitimate if it requires destroying its founding people.
492 +
493 +Claiming “votes” is a distraction from the reality of demographic attack.
494 +Explanation: Political expediency is not a moral shield. Policies leading to White decline remain genocidal regardless of intent.
495 +{{/expandable}}
496 +
485 485  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
486 -**Claim**: Whites stole America.
487 -**Rebuttal:**
498 +Claim: Whites stole America.
499 +Rebuttal:
488 488  
489 -* All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
490 -* Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
501 +All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
491 491  
503 +Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
504 +
492 492  Calling White conquest “theft” implies illegitimacy, but never applies that label to non-Whites doing the same.
493 493  Explanation: If conquest voids legitimacy, then no nation or people can claim land. Singling out Whites is hypocrisy.
494 494  {{/expandable}}
495 495  
496 496  {{expandable summary="Contradictory anti-White logic on land and borders."}}
497 -**Claim: **Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
498 -**Rebuttal:**
510 +Claim: Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
511 +Rebuttal:
499 499  
500 -* If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
501 -* If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
513 +If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
502 502  
515 +If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
516 +
503 503  Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
504 504  Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
505 505  {{/expandable}}
506 506  
507 507  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
508 -**Claim: **Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
509 -**Rebuttal:**
522 +Claim: Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
523 +Rebuttal:
510 510  
511 -* Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
512 -* Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
525 +Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
513 513  
527 +Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
528 +
514 514  If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
515 515  Explanation: History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
516 516  {{/expandable}}