Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 28.1 to 29.1 From 31.1 to 31.2

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:34

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:49

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -299,3 +299,286 @@
  Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
  {{/expandable}}
++{{expandable summary="I'm not anti-White. I'm pro-humanity."}}
++**Claim:** Advocating for humanity as a whole cannot be anti-White.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* “Humanity” is an abstraction; real loyalty is to concrete groups.
++* Supporting policies that eliminate Whites while claiming to be “pro-humanity” is hypocrisy.
++* Other groups are never told loyalty to their own people is anti-human.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Claiming to be “pro-humanity” while supporting White genocide is contradictory. Humanity is not loyal to you; groups are loyal to their kin. Denying Whites the same loyalty every other people practices is anti-White by definition.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's a demographic shift."}}
++**Claim:** White replacement is just a natural demographic change.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Deliberate government policy is driving this shift, not random chance.
++* Calling genocide a “shift” is a rhetorical trick to normalize it.
++* No one describes other genocides as mere “demographics.”
++
++**Explanation:**
++Labeling White genocide as “demographic change” hides intent. Forced immigration and assimilation are policies, not accidents. Euphemisms cannot erase the fact that deliberate engineering of population destruction is genocide.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="They just need to assimilate."}}
++**Claim:** Non-Whites can simply assimilate into White societies.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Assimilation is often code for intermarriage, which eliminates Whites genetically.
++* “Acting White” is not the same as being White.
++* Large numbers of non-Whites inevitably bring their own group identities and behaviors.
++
++**Explanation:**
++The idea of assimilation is flawed. Cultural mimicry does not change biological identity, and mass assimilation into Whites means no Whites remain. This is erasure disguised as tolerance.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="The brown future is inevitable."}}
++**Claim:** White replacement is unavoidable, so resistance is pointless.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Declaring inevitability is a psychological tactic to demoralize resistance.
++* History is full of “inevitable” predictions proven wrong (Communism, EU integration, etc.).
++* The claim admits openly that replacement is intentional.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Telling Whites their elimination is “inevitable” is both an admission and a propaganda tactic. Nothing in history is inevitable when people resist. Predictions of inevitability are political weapons, not truths.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Diversity is our strength."}}
++**Claim:** Diversity inherently strengthens societies.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Diversity is only forced on White nations, never others.
++* Homogeneity produces the highest trust and cooperation levels.
++* Every example of diversity leads to fragmentation and conflict.
++
++**Explanation:**
++The slogan “diversity is our strength” is propaganda. No evidence supports it; in fact, the opposite is true. High-trust societies are homogeneous, while diverse societies fracture. Diversity weakens unity, it does not strengthen it.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Race is a social construct."}}
++**Claim:** Race does not exist biologically, only socially.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Genetics show clear, measurable differences between groups.
++* If race did not exist, accusations against Whites for slavery or colonialism would be meaningless.
++* Anti-Whites contradict themselves by saying race is fake but Whites are uniquely guilty.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Race denial is a contradiction. Biological differences are real and documented. The claim “race doesn’t exist” is selectively used to erase Whites, while still blaming them collectively for history. That hypocrisy exposes its true purpose.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We all came from Africa."}}
++**Claim:** Common African origins make racial distinctions meaningless.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Shared distant origins do not erase present distinctions.
++* This logic could excuse any genocide by saying “we’re all from the same place.”
++* Differences that matter now remain, regardless of ancient history.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Appealing to origins in Africa is another rhetorical trick. If all groups come from Africa, why is this only used against Whites? Distinctions exist today and define real peoples. Past migrations don’t erase present identities.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Immigration is good for the economy."}}
++**Claim:** Immigration benefits the economy, so it must be positive.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Economic benefit does not justify genocide.
++* If immigration were so beneficial, non-White countries would be wealthy.
++* Long-term costs (crime, welfare, division) outweigh temporary gains.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Reducing survival to economics is immoral. A people’s existence cannot be measured in GDP points. Even if immigration boosted some metrics, it would not justify policies that destroy a people.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You're just a Nazi fascist racist bigot supremacist."}}
++**Claim:** Anyone defending Whites is simply hateful and extremist.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* These are slurs used to silence dissent.
++* None of these labels address the actual argument.
++* Name-calling replaces debate when anti-Whites have no evidence.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Slurs like “racist” and “Nazi” are used to shut down discussion, not to refute facts. They are emotional weapons of censorship. Their overuse shows weakness, not strength, in the anti-White position.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You invaded America and Australia, now you complain about invasion?"}}
++**Claim:** Whites cannot oppose immigration because they colonized in the past.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Every race has conquered land — not just Whites.
++* Past conquest does not justify genocide today.
++* By this logic, every people should be destroyed, which is absurd.
++
++**Explanation:**
++“Whites invaded” is not a valid justification for erasing Whites now. All races have expanded and conquered. Only Whites are uniquely told their past delegitimizes their present. This exposes the argument as anti-White propaganda, not principle.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Would Christ turn away sufferers?"}}
++**Claim:**It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Aren't Jews Gods chosen people? Didn't he give them Israel?
++* If these people are suffering and they are hardworking decent people, wouldn't it cause more suffering to take them away from the countries that need help the most?
++
++**Explanation:**
++God himself separated the races at the Tower of Babel and clearly designed us with different features. So not only does it do more harm than good by allowing ourselves to be demographically swamped and die out, it accomplishes nothing. Non white nations will be worse off with us gone, not better off.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="White privilege is unfair."}}
++**Claim:** Whites deserve whats happening because of their privilege.
++**Rebuttal:**
++*This isn't even true, whites are the most attacked group in America and aren't allowed any advocacies.
++*Even if it were true, it wouldn't justify us dying out
++*If this was true, it would only apply to White countries. Do you think asians dont have Asian privilege in Asian countries?
++**Explanation:**
++If whites have privilege it doesn’t justify white genocide.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
++Claim: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
++Rebuttal:
++
++Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
++
++Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
++
++A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
++Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="“For votes” doesn’t justify genocidal policies."}}
++Claim: Vote-getting justifies demographic policies.
++Rebuttal:
++
++A vote motive does not excuse replacement or dispossession.
++
++No political system is legitimate if it requires destroying its founding people.
++
++Claiming “votes” is a distraction from the reality of demographic attack.
++Explanation: Political expediency is not a moral shield. Policies leading to White decline remain genocidal regardless of intent.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
++Claim: Whites stole America.
++Rebuttal:
++
++All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
++
++Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
++
++Calling White conquest “theft” implies illegitimacy, but never applies that label to non-Whites doing the same.
++Explanation: If conquest voids legitimacy, then no nation or people can claim land. Singling out Whites is hypocrisy.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Contradictory anti-White logic on land and borders."}}
++Claim: Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
++Rebuttal:
++
++If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
++
++If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
++
++Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
++Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
++Claim: Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
++Rebuttal:
++
++Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
++
++Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
++
++If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
++Explanation: History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Saying Whites stole America admits it is White."}}
++Claim: Whites stole America.
++Rebuttal:
++
++If Whites stole it, then it is by definition a White country now.
++
++Diversity did not “steal” America; conquest and settlement did.
++
++The rhetoric inadvertently admits the truth of ownership and establishment.
++Explanation: To claim theft is to admit transfer of possession. By their own words, America is a White nation.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="If America was stolen, leave it."}}
++Claim: America was stolen from Indians.
++Rebuttal:
++
++If occupation is illegitimate, the moral solution is to vacate stolen land.
++
++Those who denounce Whites while living here prove they do not believe their own claim.
++
++Consistency would demand that anti-White activists leave America entirely.
++Explanation: Hypocrisy shows their aim is not justice but targeting Whites.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Welfare argument is irrelevant."}}
++Claim: Most people on welfare are White.
++Rebuttal:
++
++Welfare statistics do not justify demographic replacement.
++
++Whites paying into the system far exceed non-Whites, meaning redistribution favors others.
++
++Poverty does not make a people disposable.
++Explanation: Welfare arguments are red herrings; they distract from the core issue of survival.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Whites have no culture."}}
++Claim: Whites have no culture.
++Rebuttal:
++
++Western civilization is one of the richest cultural traditions in history.
++
++Claiming a people “doesn’t exist” is a known genocidal tactic.
++
++Denying identity is a step toward justifying elimination.
++Explanation: Delegitimizing culture is psychological warfare. It is proof of genocidal intent.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Globalists vs White genocide."}}
++Claim: Globalists are the real enemy, focus on them.
++Rebuttal:
++
++Globalists are dangerous, but they target Whites specifically for elimination.
++
++White nations must first secure survival before joining broader struggles.
++
++Concern trolling about “globalists” is used to divert attention from White genocide.
++Explanation: Global battles cannot be fought if Whites are erased. Survival comes before coalition.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Europe is the White homeland."}}
++Claim: Whites must go back to Europe.
++Rebuttal:
++
++By that logic, all non-Whites should leave Europe.
++
++Should Turks leave Constantinople? Should Bantus vacate southern Africa? Should tribes vacate lands they conquered?
++
++Conquest and migration are universal; only Whites are told to leave.
++Explanation: The “go back” demand is not about fairness, but about dispossessing Whites uniquely.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Conquest is consistent across races."}}
++Claim: Whites stole land, unlike others.
++Rebuttal:
++
++Turks stole Constantinople from Whites.
++
++Bantus stole southern Africa from Capoids.
++
++Ojibwe stole from Lakota, who stole from others.
++Explanation: Conquest is universal. Singling out Whites exposes bias, not principle.
++{{/expandable}}