Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 28.1 to 27.1 From 30.1 to 29.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:34

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:32

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -179,123 +179,4 @@
  Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
  {{/expandable}}
--{{expandable summary="No one's chasing you down."}}
--**Claim:** Whites can still live separately if they choose.
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Any attempt by Whites to form their own communities is targeted and dismantled.
--* Segregation laws and “anti-discrimination” policies prevent White-only spaces.
--* Whites uniquely are not allowed to escape enforced diversity.
--
--**Explanation:**
--While other groups can live together, any White attempt to do the same is criminalized or attacked. From zoning restrictions to lawsuits, the message is clear: no escape from “diversity.” That is coercion.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="We all came from a common ancestor."}}
--**Claim:** Since all humans share a common ancestor, race is irrelevant.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Shared origins do not justify present-day eradication.
--* By this logic, any genocide could be excused by tracing ancestry back far enough.
--* Distinctions between groups are real and present, regardless of ultimate origin.
--
--**Explanation:**
--Appealing to a “common ancestor” is not an argument against genocide. Every living creature has a distant common origin, but that does not negate the rights of distinct groups to exist today. Using this argument selectively against Whites is dishonest.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="You're inbred."}}
--**Claim:** Whites are genetically damaged due to inbreeding.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Every subspecies, breed, and race arises from mutations and selective in-group reproduction.
--* Inbreeding accusations are never used as a justification for eliminating other groups.
--* Whites number in the hundreds of millions — the idea they are “inbred” is absurd.
--
--**Explanation:**
--“Inbred” is a smear, not a scientific argument. All populations display in-group reproduction at some stage. Yet only Whites are told this somehow justifies their elimination. The accusation is propaganda, not biology.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="You can't control who people love."}}
--**Claim:** Intermarriage is only about free choice and love.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Mass immigration plus forced assimilation ensures intermarriage happens under engineered conditions.
--* Love is not an argument for demographic replacement programs.
--* Claiming “love” as justification ignores the coercive context of White erasure.
--
--**Explanation:**
--If an individual cannot find a partner within their own billion-strong population, that is a personal issue, not a justification for policies that eliminate an entire race. To pretend the White genocide program is “just love” is absurd.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="I can't be anti-White. I'm White."}}
--**Claim:** Whites cannot be anti-White.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Betrayal is possible within any group — traitors have existed in every nation.
--* Being White does not exempt one from enacting anti-White policies.
--* Many Whites are incentivized to oppose their own group through social and financial pressure.
--
--**Explanation:**
--Claiming identity shields one from betrayal is nonsensical. A White person who works to dismantle White survival is still anti-White. By definition, that is treachery.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="Go back to Europe."}}
--**Claim:** Whites in America should return to Europe.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Europe is also being flooded with non-Whites.
--* Every nation was founded by conquest — if Whites must “go back,” then all other groups must as well.
--* Telling Whites to leave their own creation is hypocrisy.
--
--**Explanation:**
--If hating Japanese doesn’t mean leaving Japan, and hating Blacks doesn’t mean leaving Africa, then hating Whites doesn’t mean they must leave America. Whites built these nations; they have as much right to remain as anyone.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="America was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal."}}
--**Claim:** America’s founding documents establish universal equality.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* The Declaration of Independence was wartime propaganda aimed at Europe.
--* The U.S. Constitution — the actual founding law — makes no mention of equality.
--* The stated purpose of America is securing liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.”
--
--**Explanation:**
--America’s real foundation is not abstract equality but the preservation of its people. The Constitution’s preamble is explicit about posterity. Claiming universal equality as the founding purpose is revisionism.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="It's our values that matter."}}
--**Claim:** Shared values, not shared ancestry, define civilization.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Values arise from the genetic and cultural foundations of a people.
--* Remove the people, and the values eventually collapse.
--* No people can outsource their civilization without destroying it.
--
--**Explanation:**
--Civilization is a racial construct. White values come from the White gene pool. If White people vanish, so do their values. Pretending values float independently of people is naïve.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="It's 2018! The White population is growing so there can't be a White genocide."}}
--**Claim:** Whites are not disappearing, so genocide claims are exaggerated.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* Anti-Whites admit they push immigration because Whites “aren’t having enough children.”
--* Genocide is defined by the attempt, not just the final outcome.
--* Attempted genocide is still genocide under UN law.
--
--**Explanation:**
--Whites may not yet be fully eliminated, but the policies are in place and openly defended. Attempted genocide is still a crime, and demographic replacement shows clear intent.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="We know what your kind of talk led to in the 30's."}}
--**Claim:** Discussing White survival inevitably leads to another Holocaust.
--
--**Rebuttal:**
--* No historical event justifies genocide against Whites today.
--* If past atrocities justified elimination, then Turks, Japanese, and countless others would also be targeted.
--* The argument is selective and hypocritical.
--
--**Explanation:**
--Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
--{{/expandable}}
--