Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 26.1 to 27.1 From 30.1 to 31.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/17 23:31

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:20

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
  Shared ancestry isn’t just a biological fact but a cultural cornerstone. For instance, European nations have historically formed alliances based on shared ethnic and cultural identities. Language families like the Indo-European group stem from this common ancestry, creating linguistic and cultural links across nations. Ignoring this connection overlooks a key factor in how civilizations form cohesive identities over time. Shared ancestry provides the framework upon which shared values and traditions are built, making it integral to cultural unity.
  {{/expandable}}
-- {{expandable summary="You just hate people who don't look like you."}}
++{{expandable summary="You just hate people who don't look like you."}}
  **Claim:** Advocacy for Whites is rooted in hatred toward other races.
  **Rebuttal:**
@@ -179,4 +179,243 @@
  Genocide is not limited to killing. UN Resolution 260 and Lemkin’s own words include sterilization, displacement, and policies designed to erase a group’s identity and existence. Anti-White policies meet this definition precisely.
  {{/expandable}}
++{{expandable summary="No one's chasing you down."}}
++**Claim:** Whites can still live separately if they choose.
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Any attempt by Whites to form their own communities is targeted and dismantled.
++* Segregation laws and “anti-discrimination” policies prevent White-only spaces.
++* Whites uniquely are not allowed to escape enforced diversity.
++
++**Explanation:**
++While other groups can live together, any White attempt to do the same is criminalized or attacked. From zoning restrictions to lawsuits, the message is clear: no escape from “diversity.” That is coercion.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We all came from a common ancestor."}}
++**Claim:** Since all humans share a common ancestor, race is irrelevant.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Shared origins do not justify present-day eradication.
++* By this logic, any genocide could be excused by tracing ancestry back far enough.
++* Distinctions between groups are real and present, regardless of ultimate origin.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Appealing to a “common ancestor” is not an argument against genocide. Every living creature has a distant common origin, but that does not negate the rights of distinct groups to exist today. Using this argument selectively against Whites is dishonest.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You're inbred."}}
++**Claim:** Whites are genetically damaged due to inbreeding.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Every subspecies, breed, and race arises from mutations and selective in-group reproduction.
++* Inbreeding accusations are never used as a justification for eliminating other groups.
++* Whites number in the hundreds of millions — the idea they are “inbred” is absurd.
++
++**Explanation:**
++“Inbred” is a smear, not a scientific argument. All populations display in-group reproduction at some stage. Yet only Whites are told this somehow justifies their elimination. The accusation is propaganda, not biology.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You can't control who people love."}}
++**Claim:** Intermarriage is only about free choice and love.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Mass immigration plus forced assimilation ensures intermarriage happens under engineered conditions.
++* Love is not an argument for demographic replacement programs.
++* Claiming “love” as justification ignores the coercive context of White erasure.
++
++**Explanation:**
++If an individual cannot find a partner within their own billion-strong population, that is a personal issue, not a justification for policies that eliminate an entire race. To pretend the White genocide program is “just love” is absurd.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="I can't be anti-White. I'm White."}}
++**Claim:** Whites cannot be anti-White.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Betrayal is possible within any group — traitors have existed in every nation.
++* Being White does not exempt one from enacting anti-White policies.
++* Many Whites are incentivized to oppose their own group through social and financial pressure.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Claiming identity shields one from betrayal is nonsensical. A White person who works to dismantle White survival is still anti-White. By definition, that is treachery.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Go back to Europe."}}
++**Claim:** Whites in America should return to Europe.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Europe is also being flooded with non-Whites.
++* Every nation was founded by conquest — if Whites must “go back,” then all other groups must as well.
++* Telling Whites to leave their own creation is hypocrisy.
++
++**Explanation:**
++If hating Japanese doesn’t mean leaving Japan, and hating Blacks doesn’t mean leaving Africa, then hating Whites doesn’t mean they must leave America. Whites built these nations; they have as much right to remain as anyone.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="America was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal."}}
++**Claim:** America’s founding documents establish universal equality.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* The Declaration of Independence was wartime propaganda aimed at Europe.
++* The U.S. Constitution — the actual founding law — makes no mention of equality.
++* The stated purpose of America is securing liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.”
++
++**Explanation:**
++America’s real foundation is not abstract equality but the preservation of its people. The Constitution’s preamble is explicit about posterity. Claiming universal equality as the founding purpose is revisionism.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's our values that matter."}}
++**Claim:** Shared values, not shared ancestry, define civilization.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Values arise from the genetic and cultural foundations of a people.
++* Remove the people, and the values eventually collapse.
++* No people can outsource their civilization without destroying it.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Civilization is a racial construct. White values come from the White gene pool. If White people vanish, so do their values. Pretending values float independently of people is naïve.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's 2018! The White population is growing so there can't be a White genocide."}}
++**Claim:** Whites are not disappearing, so genocide claims are exaggerated.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Anti-Whites admit they push immigration because Whites “aren’t having enough children.”
++* Genocide is defined by the attempt, not just the final outcome.
++* Attempted genocide is still genocide under UN law.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Whites may not yet be fully eliminated, but the policies are in place and openly defended. Attempted genocide is still a crime, and demographic replacement shows clear intent.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We know what your kind of talk led to in the 30's."}}
++**Claim:** Discussing White survival inevitably leads to another Holocaust.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* No historical event justifies genocide against Whites today.
++* If past atrocities justified elimination, then Turks, Japanese, and countless others would also be targeted.
++* The argument is selective and hypocritical.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Past crimes of some groups are never used to justify their eradication. Only Whites are told their history means they must die. That double standard exposes the anti-White agenda.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="I'm not anti-White. I'm pro-humanity."}}
++**Claim:** Advocating for humanity as a whole cannot be anti-White.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* “Humanity” is an abstraction; real loyalty is to concrete groups.
++* Supporting policies that eliminate Whites while claiming to be “pro-humanity” is hypocrisy.
++* Other groups are never told loyalty to their own people is anti-human.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Claiming to be “pro-humanity” while supporting White genocide is contradictory. Humanity is not loyal to you; groups are loyal to their kin. Denying Whites the same loyalty every other people practices is anti-White by definition.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="It's a demographic shift."}}
++**Claim:** White replacement is just a natural demographic change.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Deliberate government policy is driving this shift, not random chance.
++* Calling genocide a “shift” is a rhetorical trick to normalize it.
++* No one describes other genocides as mere “demographics.”
++
++**Explanation:**
++Labeling White genocide as “demographic change” hides intent. Forced immigration and assimilation are policies, not accidents. Euphemisms cannot erase the fact that deliberate engineering of population destruction is genocide.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="They just need to assimilate."}}
++**Claim:** Non-Whites can simply assimilate into White societies.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Assimilation is often code for intermarriage, which eliminates Whites genetically.
++* “Acting White” is not the same as being White.
++* Large numbers of non-Whites inevitably bring their own group identities and behaviors.
++
++**Explanation:**
++The idea of assimilation is flawed. Cultural mimicry does not change biological identity, and mass assimilation into Whites means no Whites remain. This is erasure disguised as tolerance.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="The brown future is inevitable."}}
++**Claim:** White replacement is unavoidable, so resistance is pointless.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Declaring inevitability is a psychological tactic to demoralize resistance.
++* History is full of “inevitable” predictions proven wrong (Communism, EU integration, etc.).
++* The claim admits openly that replacement is intentional.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Telling Whites their elimination is “inevitable” is both an admission and a propaganda tactic. Nothing in history is inevitable when people resist. Predictions of inevitability are political weapons, not truths.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Diversity is our strength."}}
++**Claim:** Diversity inherently strengthens societies.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Diversity is only forced on White nations, never others.
++* Homogeneity produces the highest trust and cooperation levels.
++* Every example of diversity leads to fragmentation and conflict.
++
++**Explanation:**
++The slogan “diversity is our strength” is propaganda. No evidence supports it; in fact, the opposite is true. High-trust societies are homogeneous, while diverse societies fracture. Diversity weakens unity, it does not strengthen it.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Race is a social construct."}}
++**Claim:** Race does not exist biologically, only socially.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Genetics show clear, measurable differences between groups.
++* If race did not exist, accusations against Whites for slavery or colonialism would be meaningless.
++* Anti-Whites contradict themselves by saying race is fake but Whites are uniquely guilty.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Race denial is a contradiction. Biological differences are real and documented. The claim “race doesn’t exist” is selectively used to erase Whites, while still blaming them collectively for history. That hypocrisy exposes its true purpose.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="We all came from Africa."}}
++**Claim:** Common African origins make racial distinctions meaningless.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Shared distant origins do not erase present distinctions.
++* This logic could excuse any genocide by saying “we’re all from the same place.”
++* Differences that matter now remain, regardless of ancient history.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Appealing to origins in Africa is another rhetorical trick. If all groups come from Africa, why is this only used against Whites? Distinctions exist today and define real peoples. Past migrations don’t erase present identities.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Immigration is good for the economy."}}
++**Claim:** Immigration benefits the economy, so it must be positive.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Economic benefit does not justify genocide.
++* If immigration were so beneficial, non-White countries would be wealthy.
++* Long-term costs (crime, welfare, division) outweigh temporary gains.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Reducing survival to economics is immoral. A people’s existence cannot be measured in GDP points. Even if immigration boosted some metrics, it would not justify policies that destroy a people.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You're just a Nazi fascist racist bigot supremacist."}}
++**Claim:** Anyone defending Whites is simply hateful and extremist.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* These are slurs used to silence dissent.
++* None of these labels address the actual argument.
++* Name-calling replaces debate when anti-Whites have no evidence.
++
++**Explanation:**
++Slurs like “racist” and “Nazi” are used to shut down discussion, not to refute facts. They are emotional weapons of censorship. Their overuse shows weakness, not strength, in the anti-White position.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="You invaded America and Australia, now you complain about invasion?"}}
++**Claim:** Whites cannot oppose immigration because they colonized in the past.
++
++**Rebuttal:**
++* Every race has conquered land — not just Whites.
++* Past conquest does not justify genocide today.
++* By this logic, every people should be destroyed, which is absurd.
++
++**Explanation:**
++“Whites invaded” is not a valid justification for erasing Whites now. All races have expanded and conquered. Only Whites are uniquely told their past delegitimizes their present. This exposes the argument as anti-White propaganda, not principle.
++{{/expandable}}
++