Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page DEI

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/09/15 15:53
From version 5.1
edited by Imabot fromtelegram
on 2025/04/15 13:48
Change comment: Upload new image "photo_AgACAgEAAyEFAASPk76iAAIFJ2f-xe-LASRqnDUtyCVa_be2b0497.jpg", version 1.1
To version 74.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/09/15 15:36
Change comment: Upload new image "Screenshot_20231208_143617_Word [Discrimination_ criteria_ different_ evaluation_ from_ image_ images_ will].jpg", version 1.1

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.TelegramBot
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Content
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,188 @@
1 +{{dashboard/}}
1 1  
3 +[[image:photo_AgACAgEAAyEFAASPk76iAAIEiWf9ozpDWLlQIfomoXLve483Rr1gAAKArjEbdLTwR-pQ30cRn1oYAQADAgADeQADNgQ.jpg||alt="DEI Framework Illustration" style="float:right; margin:10px; width:300px;"]]
2 2  
3 -{{velocity}}
4 -#set($attachments = $doc.getAttachmentList())
5 += Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion =
5 5  
6 -{{gallery}}
7 -#foreach($attachment in $attachments)
8 - #if($attachment.filename.endsWith(".jpg") || $attachment.filename.endsWith(".png") || $attachment.filename.endsWith(".webp"))
9 - image:$attachment.filename
10 - #end
11 -#end
12 -{{/gallery}}
13 -{{/velocity}}
7 +{{tooltip label="Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}DEI refers to organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination based on identity or disability.{{/tooltip}} are organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination based on identity or disability. These three notions (diversity, equity, and inclusion) together represent "three closely linked values" which organizations seek to institutionalize through DEI frameworks. The concepts predate this terminology and other variations sometimes include terms such as {{tooltip label="belonging" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}The feeling of being accepted and valued as a member of a group or organization.{{/tooltip}}, {{tooltip label="justice" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}The quality of being fair and reasonable in the treatment of people.{{/tooltip}}, and {{tooltip label="accessibility" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}The practice of making information, activities, and environments usable by as many people as possible.{{/tooltip}}.
14 14  
9 +*Diversity* refers to the presence of variety within the organizational workforce in characteristics such as race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, veteran status, or religion. *Equity* refers to concepts of fairness and justice, such as fair compensation and substantive equality. More specifically, equity usually also includes a focus on societal disparities and allocating resources and "decision making authority to groups that have historically been disadvantaged", and taking "into consideration a person's unique circumstances, adjusting treatment accordingly so that the end result is equal." Finally, *inclusion* refers to creating an organizational culture that creates an experience where "all employees feel their voices will be heard", and a sense of belonging and integration.
15 15  
11 +DEI policies are often used by managers to increase the productivity and collaborative efforts of their workforce and to reinforce positive communication. While DEI is most associated with non-elected government or corporate environments, it's commonly implemented within many types of organizations, such as charitable organizations, academia, schools, and hospitals. DEI policies often include certain training efforts, such as {{tooltip label="diversity training" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Educational programs designed to help people recognize and overcome their unconscious biases and prejudices.{{/tooltip}}.
12 +
13 +DEI efforts and policies have generated criticism and controversy, some directed at the specific effectiveness of its tools, such as diversity training; its effect on free speech and academic freedom, as well as more broadly attracting criticism on political or philosophical grounds. In addition, the term "DEI" has gained traction as an ethnic slur towards minority groups in the United States.
14 +
15 +== History in the United States ==
16 +
17 +=== Early history ===
18 +
19 +Early DEI efforts included preferential hiring to veterans of the US Civil War and their widows in 1865. In 1876, this was amended to give preference to veterans during a Reduction in Force. In 1921 and 1929, executive orders by presidents Coolidge and Harding established ten-point preference for veterans towards exams and hiring criteria for federal employment. In 1944, the Veterans' Preference Act codified the previous executive orders, clarified criteria, and included special hiring provisions for disabled veterans. Later amendments added veterans from conflicts after World War II, special provisions for the mothers of disabled or deceased veterans, and job-specific training for veterans entering the federal or private workforce.
20 +
21 +In 1936, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Randolph-Sheppard Act, which mandated the federal government to give preference to purchase products made by the blind, and established the Committee on Purchases of Blind Made Products. The 1971 Javits–Wagner–O'Day Act expanded the Randolph-Sheppard act and changed the name to The Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (now AbilityOne). Blind-made products are used throughout the federal government, and include brands such as Skillcraft, ARC Diversified, Austin Lighthouse, and Ability One.
22 +
23 +Other DEI policies include {{tooltip label="Affirmative Action" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Policies that give preferential treatment to members of historically disadvantaged groups in employment, education, and other areas.{{/tooltip}}. The legal term "affirmative action" was first used in "Executive Order No. 10925", signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961, which included a provision that government contractors "take *affirmative action* to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated [fairly] during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin". It was used to promote actions that achieve non-discrimination.
24 +
25 +=== 1980s ===
26 +
27 +The 1980s saw the expansion of DEI programs beyond government employment to include private corporations and educational institutions. The Reagan administration, while generally opposed to affirmative action, did not eliminate existing programs, and many corporations began implementing their own diversity initiatives.
28 +
29 +=== 1990s ===
30 +
31 +The 1990s marked a significant expansion of DEI programs, particularly in corporate America. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 strengthened existing anti-discrimination laws and provided for monetary damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination. This period also saw the rise of {{tooltip label="diversity consultants" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Professionals who help organizations implement diversity and inclusion programs.{{/tooltip}} and the development of comprehensive diversity training programs.
32 +
33 +=== Since the 2000s ===
34 +
35 +The 2000s and beyond have seen an exponential growth in DEI programs, with many organizations implementing mandatory diversity training, unconscious bias workshops, and comprehensive inclusion initiatives. This period has also seen significant controversy and backlash against DEI programs, with critics arguing that they have become overly politicized and counterproductive.
36 +
37 +==== United States government purge ====
38 +
39 +Recent years have seen a significant backlash against DEI programs, particularly in government and educational institutions. Several states have passed laws restricting or banning DEI programs in public institutions, and there has been growing criticism of the effectiveness and necessity of these programs.
40 +
41 +== Rationale ==
42 +
43 +The rationale for DEI programs typically centers on several key arguments:
44 +
45 +**Moral Imperative:** Proponents argue that DEI is morally necessary to address historical injustices and ensure fair treatment for all individuals.
46 +
47 +**Business Case:** Many organizations implement DEI programs based on the belief that diverse teams perform better and are more innovative.
48 +
49 +**Legal Compliance:** DEI programs are often implemented to ensure compliance with anti-discrimination laws and regulations.
50 +
51 +**Social Justice:** DEI is seen as a tool for promoting social justice and reducing inequality in society.
52 +
53 +However, critics argue that these rationales are often based on flawed assumptions and that DEI programs may actually increase rather than decrease discrimination and division.
54 +
55 +== Methods and arguments ==
56 +
57 +=== Corporate ===
58 +
59 +Corporate DEI programs typically include several key components:
60 +
61 +**Diversity Training:** Mandatory training programs designed to help employees recognize and overcome unconscious bias.
62 +
63 +**Hiring Practices:** Modified recruitment and selection processes designed to increase diversity, often through preferential treatment of certain groups.
64 +
65 +**Affinity Groups:** Employee resource groups based on shared characteristics such as race, gender, or sexual orientation.
66 +
67 +**Mentorship Programs:** Programs that pair employees from underrepresented groups with senior leaders.
68 +
69 +**Performance Metrics:** Systems for tracking and measuring diversity and inclusion outcomes.
70 +
71 +Critics argue that these methods often lead to {{tooltip label="reverse discrimination" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Discrimination against members of a dominant or majority group in favor of members of a minority or historically disadvantaged group.{{/tooltip}} and may actually increase rather than decrease workplace tension and division.
72 +
73 +== Political and public reaction in the U.S. ==
74 +
75 +=== Higher education ===
76 +
77 +DEI programs in higher education have been particularly controversial, with many universities implementing comprehensive diversity and inclusion initiatives. These programs often include mandatory diversity training, bias reporting systems, and curriculum changes designed to promote inclusion.
78 +
79 +Critics argue that these programs have led to a decline in academic freedom and free speech on college campuses, with faculty and students reporting self-censorship due to fear of being accused of bias or discrimination.
80 +
81 +=== Entertainment and media ===
82 +
83 +The entertainment and media industries have been at the forefront of DEI implementation, with many companies implementing diversity quotas and inclusion initiatives. This has led to significant controversy, with critics arguing that these programs have led to a decline in quality and creativity.
84 +
85 +=== Politics ===
86 +
87 +DEI has become a highly politicized issue, with conservative politicians and commentators arguing that these programs are discriminatory and counterproductive, while liberal politicians and commentators defend them as necessary for social justice.
88 +
89 +=== Military ===
90 +
91 +The military has implemented various DEI programs, including diversity training and modified recruitment practices. This has led to controversy, with some arguing that these programs may compromise military effectiveness and readiness.
92 +
93 +=== Public boycotts ===
94 +
95 +Several companies have faced public boycotts and criticism for their DEI programs, with consumers expressing frustration over what they see as excessive political correctness and discrimination against certain groups.
96 +
97 +=== Public opinion ===
98 +
99 +Public opinion on DEI is deeply divided, with surveys showing significant disagreement over the effectiveness and necessity of these programs. Many Americans express concern that DEI programs have become overly politicized and may actually increase rather than decrease discrimination and division.
100 +
101 +== Criticism and controversy in the United States ==
102 +
103 +=== Diversity training ===
104 +
105 +Diversity training has been one of the most controversial aspects of DEI programs. Research has shown that mandatory diversity training often backfires, leading to increased tension and decreased trust among employees. A 2019 meta-analysis found that diversity training programs had no significant effect on workplace diversity or employee attitudes.
106 +
107 +=== Mandatory diversity statements within academia ===
108 +
109 +Many universities now require job applicants to submit diversity statements as part of their application process. Critics argue that these statements are used to screen out candidates with conservative or dissenting views, leading to a lack of ideological diversity in academia.
110 +
111 +=== Equity versus equality ===
112 +
113 +The distinction between equity and equality has been a source of significant controversy. Critics argue that the equity approach often leads to reverse discrimination and undermines merit-based systems.
114 +
115 +=== Effects on free speech and academic freedom ===
116 +
117 +DEI programs have been criticized for their negative effects on free speech and academic freedom. Many faculty and students report self-censoring their speech due to fear of being accused of bias or discrimination.
118 +
119 +=== Antisemitism ===
120 +
121 +DEI programs have been criticized for their handling of antisemitism, with some arguing that these programs often fail to adequately address anti-Jewish discrimination while focusing heavily on other forms of bias.
122 +
123 +=== Disability community ===
124 +
125 +The disability community has expressed mixed views on DEI programs, with some arguing that these programs have been helpful in promoting inclusion, while others argue that they have not adequately addressed the specific needs of people with disabilities.
126 +
127 +=== "Diversity hire" label ===
128 +
129 +The term "diversity hire" has become a source of controversy, with some arguing that it stigmatizes employees who are hired through diversity initiatives, while others argue that it accurately describes the reality of many hiring practices.
130 +
131 +== Diversity issues in other countries ===
132 +
133 +=== DE&I criteria ===
134 +
135 +Different countries have taken different approaches to diversity and inclusion, with some implementing more moderate programs and others avoiding them altogether. The effectiveness of these different approaches varies significantly.
136 +
137 +== Alternative approaches ==
138 +
139 +Critics of DEI programs often advocate for alternative approaches that focus on individual merit and equal opportunity rather than group-based preferences. These approaches include:
140 +
141 +**Merit-based hiring:** Evaluating candidates based on their qualifications and performance rather than their demographic characteristics.
142 +
143 +**Colorblind policies:** Treating all individuals equally regardless of their race or other characteristics.
144 +
145 +**Class-based approaches:** Focusing on economic disadvantage rather than racial or gender identity.
146 +
147 +**Viewpoint diversity:** Promoting diversity of thought and opinion rather than demographic diversity.
148 +
149 +== Conclusion ==
150 +
151 +DEI programs represent a significant departure from traditional merit-based systems and individual rights. While their proponents argue that they are necessary to address historical discrimination and promote social justice, critics raise serious concerns about their effectiveness, fairness, and impact on individual freedom and social cohesion.
152 +
153 +The empirical evidence suggests that DEI programs often fail to achieve their stated goals and may actually increase discrimination and division rather than reduce them. The psychological impact on employees, the legal and constitutional concerns, and the economic costs all warrant careful consideration.
154 +
155 +As society grapples with issues of fairness and equality, it is important to consider alternative approaches that promote individual merit, equal opportunity, and social harmony. The goal should be to create a society where all individuals can thrive based on their individual abilities and contributions, rather than being defined primarily by their group identity.
156 +
157 +== See also ==
158 +
159 +* [[Affirmative Action]]
160 +* [[Critical Race Theory]]
161 +* [[Identity Politics]]
162 +* [[Intersectionality]]
163 +* [[Reverse Discrimination]]
164 +* [[Merit-based Systems]]
165 +
166 +== References ==
167 +
168 +1. **Forscher, P.S., et al. (2019).** "A Meta-Analysis of Procedures to Change Implicit Bias." *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology*, 117(3), 522–559.
169 +
170 +2. **Dobbin, Frank, and Alexandra Kalev. (2020).** "Why Diversity Programs Fail." *Harvard Business Review*.
171 +
172 +3. **Sowell, Thomas. (2019).** *Discrimination and Disparities.* Basic Books.
173 +
174 +4. **Steele, Shelby. (2006).** *White Guilt: How Whites and Blacks Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era.* HarperCollins.
175 +
176 +5. **Manhattan Institute. (2021).** "The Impact of DEI Programs on Corporate Performance." [Link](https://www.manhattan-institute.org)
177 +
178 +6. **Cato Institute. (2021).** "Free Speech and DEI in the Workplace." [Link](https://www.cato.org)
179 +
180 +7. **Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. (2020).** "Academic Freedom and DEI Programs." [Link](https://www.thefire.org)
181 +
182 +8. **Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2021).** "Discrimination Complaints and DEI Programs." [Link](https://www.eeoc.gov)
183 +
184 +9. **National Association of Scholars. (2021).** "Diversity Statements in Academic Hiring." [Link](https://www.nas.org)
185 +
186 +10. **American Council of Trustees and Alumni. (2019).** "Academic Standards and DEI Programs." [Link](https://www.goacta.org)
187 +
188 +{{putFootnotes/}}
0_Cheeseman-tweet-1165787.jpeg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +88.7 KB
Content
1 in 6 hiring managers survey.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +468.3 KB
Content
1000000696.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +90.1 KB
Content
1000000697.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +81.9 KB
Content
1000000699.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +85.4 KB
Content
1000000830.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +69.6 KB
Content
1000004193.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +161.3 KB
Content
1000004561.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +145.2 KB
Content
1000007916.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +67.6 KB
Content
20231227141522.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +71.1 KB
Content
2024-12-2114_17_09-Clipboard.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +50.8 KB
Content
20240130152953.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +120.8 KB
Content
20240320045922.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +89.3 KB
Content
20240821223647.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +276.2 KB
Content
20241013092806.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +160.6 KB
Content
438ac1382fab175fa206c29972a01cf7-Full.webp
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +27.5 KB
Content
AAMC_MCAT_ACCEPTANCE_RATES.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +35.5 KB
Content
Dei causes suspicion.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +890.2 KB
Content
F4uQ8-qxhn9ULrIi.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +137.4 MB
Content
F4uQ8-qxhn9ULrIi_1.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +31.4 MB
Content
F4uQ8-qxhn9ULrIi_2.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +44.5 MB
Content
Navy Removing photos from boards hurts diversity.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +665.7 KB
Content
ONQs4PwMGLNaA8Vg.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +6.6 MB
Content
Propaganda & Media-Anti-Dumping_Arguments,_The_Myth_of_the_Chinese_Model_of_Development..jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +707.7 KB
Content
Public university to host whites-only student retreat on ‘white privilege’ The College Fix.md
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +4.3 KB
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,49 @@
1 +---
2 +title: Public university to host whites-only student retreat on ‘white privilege’ | The College Fix
3 +source: https://www.thecollegefix.com/public-university-host-whites-student-retreat-white-privilege/
4 +author:
5 + - "[[Michael McGrady - CU Colorado Springs]]"
6 +published: 2016-08-17
7 +created: 2024-12-03
8 +description: Students will learn how to ‘take action against racism.’…
9 +tags:
10 + - clippings
11 + - education
12 + - hatred
13 + - whiteness
14 + - crt
15 + - privilege
16 +---
17 +![](https://www.thecollegefix.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/WhitePrivilege.Shutterstock-370x242.jpg)
18 +
19 +The University of Vermont is slated to host a whites-only student retreat this November focused on teaching participants about their white privilege and how to they can help reverse the negative effect their white privilege has on their campus and the nation.
20 +
21 +The “Examining White Privilege: A Retreat for Undergraduate Students Who Self-Identify as White” is predicated on the notion that white privilege is real, and that it is and pressing problem facing this nation, as students who attend will learn how to understand “the impact of white privilege” and how to take “action against racism,” the university’s website [states](https://www.uvm.edu/~asc/?Page=whiteid-app.php&SM=eventsmenu.html).
22 +
23 +“It’s a new retreat specifically for white students to engage in building a stronger and inclusive campus community,” the University of Vermont’s website adds.
24 +
25 +***‘Blame the White Guy’***
26 +
27 +The retreat is relatively new. It was offered last year as well, when it made national headlines. Many conservative pundits criticized it at the time.
28 +
29 +“They should’ve just called it ‘Blame the White Guy 2015,’” [opined](http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/11/19/blame-white-guy-2015-university-group-hosts-white-privilege-retreat.html) *Fox News’* Todd Starnes. And Kimberly Ross on *RedState* [noted](http://www.redstate.com/kimberly_ross/2015/11/18/white-feel-bad-attend-retreat/) “it really is nothing but judging others based on their appearance and cultural upbringing, assuming things about both, and trying to correct them. And that sounds a lot like a wrong that has been done before.”
30 +
31 +Asked about the criticism, Enrique Corredera, director of university communications, defended the retreat in an email last week to *The College Fix.*
32 +
33 +“UVM’s Examining White Privilege Retreat (in 2015) was the second such gathering to explore issues of identity, diversity, and culture,” he said. “This non-credit bearing retreat was designed to engage white students who wanted to become more effective allies in confronting racism and supporting students of color at UVM. These students were seeking an educational opportunity for themselves to learn about and understand the issue of white privilege, its historical roots, and its current dynamics and impact.”
34 +
35 +***Taxpayer funded***
36 +
37 +Students are given full meals and an education on white privilege all for free, as the public university picks up the tab. Last year’s retreat cost $6,000, Corredera told *The Fix.*
38 +
39 +UVM’s program is not unique, either. Oregon State University [spent](https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/27209/) $11,500 on a series of similar retreats during the last school year.
40 +
41 +One such retreat, called “Examining White Identity in a Multicultural World,” gave white students a chance to examine their “white identity” and “white privilege,” as well as to discuss “strategies to dismantle oppressive systems,” the university’s website stated.
42 +
43 +Oregon State plans to host similar retreats again, slated to take place sometime in 2017, according to its website.
44 +
45 +Corredera said such retreats are all part of the higher education experience.
46 +
47 +“This retreat is an example of the varied programs available at many universities to assist students in their quest for better understanding of culture and history in order to become responsible global leaders,” he said. “It is a piece of a broad array of different offerings for students to facilitate meaningful and civil dialogue and expanded awareness and insights across a range of diverse backgrounds with respect to difficult and important societal challenges.”
48 +
49 +[Like *The College Fix* on Facebook](http://www.facebook.com/thecollegefix) / [Follow us on Twitter](http://www.twitter.com/collegefix)
Rachel_Spraker_is_a_DEI_administrator.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +111.9 KB
Content
Screenshot 20240606 075753 Brave.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +723.4 KB
Content
Screenshot_20231208_143037_Word [Discrimination_ candidates_ faculty_ image_ images_ practices_ search_ searches].jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +614.8 KB
Content
Screenshot_20231208_143429_Word [Discrimination_ candidates_ criteria_ dropped_ image_ images_ someone_ your].jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +609.3 KB
Content
Screenshot_20231208_143553_Word [Discrimination_ bias_ department_ faculty_ image_ images_ members_ which].jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +557.1 KB
Content
Screenshot_20231208_143553_Word.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +557.1 KB
Content
Screenshot_20231208_143617_Word [Discrimination_ criteria_ different_ evaluation_ from_ image_ images_ will].jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +564.9 KB
Content
allyship_learning_sessions_trainings_the_text_appears_to_be_related.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +39.3 KB
Content
bias_gender_job_search_the_text_discusses_gender_bias_in.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +60.2 KB
Content
blacklivesmatter_social_justice_community_building_the_text_outlines_the_guiding.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +244.2 KB
Content
blacks overrepresented in media.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +610.4 KB
Content
bos_oma_apnewscomaricienhisp_surrorrmocraoenracrexseoounuse_borat_israchlebanon_live_updates_murleane_helene.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +43.3 KB
Content
ciardp78053_approved_for_release_20000908_ciardp7805343a000200090018_subject_sensitivity_training_overwhelming.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +350.6 KB
Content
dei discrimination.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +283.9 KB
Content
dei spending corporate.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +913.0 KB
Content
dei spending.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +1.1 MB
Content
dei struggle 2.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +524.2 KB
Content
dei struggle 3.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +548.8 KB
Content
dei struggle 4.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +580.5 KB
Content
dei struggle seminar workshop.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +678.1 KB
Content
dept of transportation dei.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +832.8 KB
Content
diversity_inclusion_equity_the_text_discusses_diversifying_departments_and_hiring.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +59.2 KB
Content
diversitymadness.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +17.7 KB
Content
english touring opera drops 14 white musicians.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +803.8 KB
Content
inclusion_diversity_employment_the_text_describes_a_job_creation_initiative.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +252.8 KB
Content
libsoftiktok_720p_20240115_111111.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +3.6 MB
Content
mayo clinic dei preference.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +542.5 KB
Content
navy removing photos2.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +533.8 KB
Content
nba racial report card 1.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +678.7 KB
Content
nba racial report card.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +803.6 KB
Content
no white male policy.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +517.4 KB
Content
no white men policy.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +506.1 KB
Content
nonwhites payed more at microsoft.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +626.2 KB
Content
nrctp2eE3zmbLyme.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +67.3 MB
Content
oriIWgLXmHXQaX_g.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +9.6 MB
Content
overt_white_supremacy_socially_unacceptable_tines_auc_overs_nace_astaus.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +70.9 KB
Content
people_ops_google_confidential_proprietary_allyship_action_session_googlers_privilege.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +63.6 KB
Content
race_identity_police_the_text_discusses_a_police_officers_lawsuit.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +87.9 KB
Content
school dei Discriminatio_ help_ image_ images_ implicit_ microaggressions_ race_ resources.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +591.8 KB
Content