But White women are whores

1

2

= The latest studies and statistics on interracial relationships =

3

4

Focusing on:

5

- Online dating and hookups

6

- Marriage

7

- Cohabitation

8

- Birth data and trends

9

- Relationship outcomes

10

From 2014 to 2024

11

12

[[image:GeEgU8MWcAAEOuh.jpg||width="350px"]]

13

14

== The earliest data from OkCupid ==

15

16

White women are the most racially exclusive.

17

Despite liberals outnumbering cons over 2 to 1, and their preference taboo.

18

Exclusivity increased in 2014, despite an altered matching algorithm.

19

Asian women desired Black men more than White women.

20

21

[[image:GeEhikVWQAAOdYf.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEhje9WoAAabKy.png||width="350px"]]

22

23

[Source](https://www.psychologytoday.com/sg/blog/pop-psych/201401/what-does-online-dating-tell-us-about-racial-views)

24

25

== OkCupid Matching Scores ==

26

27

'QuickMatch score' predicts compatibility based on profile information, rather than visual attraction.

28

'Let's Meet score' predicts the willingness to engage in real-world meeting based on visual attraction (rating).

29

[More info](http://shorturl.at/2zNvc)

30

31

[[image:GeEhkDXXwAApqKF.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEhkr4WIAAufIw.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEhrA8WwAAkrdD.jpg||width="350px"]]

32

33

== European Online Dating Study (2015) ==

34

35

Individuals uniformly prefer to date same-race partners, and there is a hierarchy of preferences among natives and minorities.

36

Non-Arabic minority daters have strong preferences for Europeans.

37

38

[[image:GeEhyWlXsAAn9Zd.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEhy53WIAAJON_.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEhzYlXAAAOZsc.png||width="300px"]]

39

40

== Crossracial Differences in Preferences (2016) ==

41

42

African-Americans are the least desired dating partners.

43

The percentage of European-Americans willing to date African-Americans is significantly lower than the percentage willing to date Hispanic and Asian-Americans.

44

45

[[image:GeEh5f_XkAATVCz.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEh6BIWkAAbeMZ.png||width="350px"]]

46

47

== Assortative Mating and Online Dating (2017, Germany) ==

48

49

Online dating reduces endogamy compared to other forms of meeting partners, but mainly educational and religious endogamy.

50

Racial endogamy is twice as prevalent as the former two.

51

52

[[image:GeEiBViWcAAO_h1.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEiCdyXAAAB3Bk.png||width="350px"]]

53

54

== Tinder Usage and Interracial Dating (2020, Netherlands) ==

55

56

Using 24 fake Tinder profiles featuring White and non-White people (minorities in the Netherlands: Turkish, Moroccan, etc).

57

12 White, 12 non-White.

58

All respondents found White-looking profiles more attractive.

59

60

[[image:GeEiZQAXAAAitYl.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEigtRWAAAmzee.png||width="350px"]]

61

62

Study limitations: Asking respondents to indicate ethnic similarity could have primed them to the purpose of the study, and led to increased social desirability in their answers.

63

Conclusion: All respondents ranked Caucasian-looking Tinder users as more attractive and dateable.

64

65

== Modeling Dating Decisions (2021) ==

66

67

"Attractiveness and race were nearly double the influence of other things...

68

While attractiveness played a major role in the participants' decisions to swipe left or right, race was a leading factor."

69

70

[[image:GeEingJWUAAhkg4.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEioFUXkAAA8dW.png||width="350px"]]

71

72

Conclusion:

73

"When the targets were Black, Asian, or Hispanic, they were less likely to be swiped right on. Among the largest effect sizes was a lower likelihood of swiping right if the target was Black.

74

Negative stereotypes may impact their [perceived] attractiveness."

75

76

[[image:GeEix-BWgAApy7S.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEiyiFXcAAUYG6.png||width="350px"]]

77

78

== Assortative Online Dating (2022, Netherlands) ==

79

80

Respondents with a Dutch ancestry were more likely to select a White person.

81

Both Dutch and non-Dutch ancestry preferred White targets.

82

Race was the most important factor in partner choice.

83

84

[[image:GeEi554WwAAO7bQ.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEi6a0XkAAOvGR.png||width="350px"]]

85

86

A dating app experiment with 500 young adults:

87

Visual cues to race determine selection, while related cultural signaling appears irrelevant.

88

89

[[image:GeEi_7qWIAA4P-h.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEjAaZWwAAmGAu.png||width="350px"]]

90

91

== Romance & Racism (2022) ==

92

93

White women particularly had strong same-race preferences.

94

Latinas liked White men over Black and Asian, but not Latinos.

95

Asian women preferred Asian over Black, but not White men.

96

Black women did not show a preference for any race.

97

98

[[image:GeEjHvkWIAA-L3h.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEjINRW4AAEnMq.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEjIuuXAAELMhS.png||width="300px"]]

99

100

White women and Latinas were more willing to date White men than Asian and Black men.

101

Asian and Black men were equally disliked.

102

Asian women preferred White and Asian men. (They were more willing to date Black men than White women were.)

103

Black women had no racial preference.

104

105

[[image:GeEjRC0XoAAhawH.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEjRm1XgAAfuwa.png||width="350px"]]

106

107

== Tinder and Russian Generation Z (2022) ==

108

109

Dateability is heavily influenced by racial preferences.

110

Almost everyone stated that they would never swipe right on someone of a different race.

111

112

[[image:GeEjdqXWMAAjI8u.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEjeUAWQAAptFT.png||width="350px"]]

113

114

Theorized cause: "Sexual racism" from Russian media.

115

Russian children don't see Black people growing up, so they absorb pictures of Blacks from Russian pop culture. This shows them with low social capital, thus zoomers hesitate.

116

117

[[image:GeEjmlVWcAATC56.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjnf6WUAAw71T.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjn-tXkAAJZDf.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjoZeXoAAhaRk.jpg||width="250px"]]

118

119

== Racial Preferences in Dating Apps (2023, Aldana et al) ==

120

121

In a mock tinder app with 2,513 participants:

122

All of the female participants who initiated a conversation in the heterosexual condition with the Black male profile were trans women, according to their bios.

123

124

[[image:GeEjydPWgAAKbP-.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjzCfWMAA66c0.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjzi5WkAALq4c.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEj0BgXYAAsBef.jpg||width="250px"]]

125

126

Thousands of people saw these profiles.

127

White profiles had more likes in every situation.

128

Conclusion: Homogamous preferences, and rooted problems like sexual racism, can lead users to maintain a racialized sexual hierarchy that privileges Whiteness.

129

130

[[image:GeEkIE6W0AAi6qS.jpg||width="350px"]]

131

132

== Match's Singles in America (2023) ==

133

134

Gen Z Less Likely To Date Outside of Their Race Than Millennials.

135

While Gen Z might be known for their progressive politics, they might not be as progressive when it comes to dating compared with their Millenial elders.

136

137

[[image:GeEkfFQWIAAgOaK.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEkfnEXUAAajhI.jpg||width="350px"]]

138

139

== Annual Review of Sociology (2024) ==

140

141

It was speculated that Asian men face more discrimination from White women than Black men do.

142

Yet, Black and Asian men outmarry at similar rates.

143

White women discriminate against Black and Asian men equally.

144

145

[[image:GeEkrbsWkAEGDEd.png||width="350px"]]

146

147

Therefore, White men's marriage patterns with Black women are the anomaly, and must be due to anti-Black discrimination.

148

White men's anti-Black discrimination may be a more important explanation for observed intermarriage patterns.

149

150

[[image:GeEkyBdWQAAI1ux.png||width="350px"]]

151

152

== Racial Marriage Preferences and Online Dating (2024) ==

153

154

The rise of dating apps hasn't changed racial marriage preferences:

155

"Our results indicated strong racial preferences... The paper found minimal changes in these preferences over the 2008-21 period, in which online dating dominated marriage selection."

156

157

[[image:GeEk5WXXgAA4E6z.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEk528WQAAC1zc.png||width="350px"]]

158

159

Conclusion:

160

Our findings of minimal changes in preferences over the 2008-21 period is surprising. Given the proliferation of online dating...

161

Because people have increasingly been marrying someone more like themselves, that can account for the increase in household inequality.

162

163

[[image:GeEk9p-WgAAE_f6.png||width="350px"]]

= Marriage =

Among currently married women in their 1st marriage in 2016, 10 percent were in an interracial/interethnic marriage.

168

10.3% of women

169

5.1% of married non-Hispanic White women

170

8% of married Black women

171

20.6% of Asian women

172

22.4% of Hispanic or Latino (any race)

173

174

[[image:GeElhTVWUAAgkH8.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeElh5kWoAAfp4j.png||width="350px"]]

175

176

Why is the number (5.1%) so low here?

177

Research has shown that interracial couples have higher rates of divorce than other couples, so the percentage of currently married interracial couples shown in the table may be lower than the percentage of interracial couples who married.

178

179

[[image:GeEl0I4WYAAOtU5.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEl0u4XIAAw68r.png||width="350px"]]

180

181

What are the trends?

182

2000-2016, the total % of interracial married households increased from 7.4% to 10.2%.

183

Of this:

184

White/Hispanic: 35% to 40% respectively.

185

White/Asian: 12.5%-14.4%

186

White/Black couples: 7.1%-8.1%.

187

Note: this is % of IR households, not all households

188

189

[[image:GeEmHEXXkAEuRGK.jpg||width="350px"]]

190

191

== Black-White Intermarriage in a Global Perspective (2023) ==

192

193

For the first time, French data includes a proxy for race!

194

White females | White males:

Brazil: 5.4% / 4.1%

France: 2.0% / 1.4%

UK: 0.7% / 0.4%

USA: 2.0% / 0.6%

SA: 0.5% / 1.0%

[[image:GeEmn2hXsAA5TMv.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEmoQjWEAAe5dp.png||width="350px"]]

202

203

"We use the term intermarriage in a generic manner; in our study we examine both married and cohabiting couples.

204

A feature of black–white intermarriage in the US is an imbalanced sex ratio; such gender imbalances are not found in any other countries."

205

[Full study](https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol49/28/49-28.pdf)

206

207

[[image:GeEm27LWgAA3msM.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEm4F-XoAAiybb.png||width="350px"]]

208

209

== Marital Instability Among Interracial Couples ==

210

211

White wife/Black husband marriages show twice the divorce rate of White wife/White husband couples by the 10th year of marriage.

212

The highest divorce rate of any combo, including Black-Black marriages.

213

214

[[image:GeEpG5MWUAAPMBw.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEpbHcXYAEvFz6.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEpcyAXAAADxAL.jpg||width="250px"]]

215

216

From a later study "Marital Dissolution...":

217

Black husband-White wife marriages are 185% more likely to end in divorce.

218

White Husband-Black wife, 158%

219

Hispanic Husband-White wife, 133%

220

White Husband-Hispanic wife, 111%

221

Both gender combinations with Asians had lower divorce rates

222

223

[[image:GeEp8eSWQAAPIhS.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEp9BBXIAIMpmK.png||width="350px"]]

= Cohabitation =

8% of White adults cohabit, 57% are married.

228

Whites are the least likely to cohabit interracially, at 12%.

229

Of cohabiting households in 2007-2011, 2.7% were Black-White.

230

In 2017-2021, this share increased to 2.8%.

231

A 0.1% increase in the last decade.

232

233

[[image:GeEqJ0sXgAAEK28.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqKTGW0AAcgV4.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqKu7XsAAhgue.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqLMnWEAAuKb5.png||width="250px"]]

234

235

White men and women have the same cohabitation rates: 7.9% each.

236

Cohabitation rates have plateaued over the past decade.

237

Only 26% of non-Hispanic White women remain in their cohabitant union for at least 3 years before separation. 8% survive 5 years.

238

239

[[image:GeEqSZkXcAAP9GH.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqS3YXgAAvhXt.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqTUpWoAAnSJn.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqTzZWEAAsfGK.png||width="250px"]]

= IR Birth Data =

From the latest CDC Natality Statistics:

244

For White mother births in 2023 (Excluding unknown):

245

87.6% of fathers are non-Hispanic White

246

5.6% are Hispanic-White

247

3.5% are Black (Hisp and non)

248

2.1% are 2 or more races (H&N)

249

1.2% are Asian (H&N)

250

251

[[image:GeEqgXTXwAAwJwc.png||width="350px"]]

252

253

For White father births in 2023 (Excluding unknown):

254

88% of mothers are non-Hispanic White

255

6.2% are Hispanic-White

256

2% are Asian (Hisp and non)

257

2% are 2 or more races (H&N)

258

1.25% are Black (H&N)

259

260

[[image:GeEqqsCWkAAApq-.png||width="350px"]]

261

262

Broken down by single moms and dads (Excl Unknown):

263

White single mothers, by race of dad:

Black: 62%

2 or more races: 46%

Hispanic-White: 43%

Asian: 27.3%

Non-Hispanic White: 23%

269

For White single fathers:

Black: 42%

Hispanic-White: 39%

Asian: 27%

Non-Hispanic White: 23%

274

275

[[image:GeEsXgBXUAAeyHw.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEsY1kWUAAeXau.png||width="350px"]]

276

277

== Birthrate Trends (2016-2023) ==

278

279

Like in all previous years, the overall number of IR births is down since 2016.

280

The increases in percentage (0.1% every 3 years for BM-WW births) isn't due to an increase in their number—rather White-White births have simply declined overall.

281

282

[[image:GeEsg7WW4AAN6iJ.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEshc2XQAAWUsg.png||width="350px"]]

283

284

Key points from the CDC data:

285

IR couples with non-Whites have higher rates of single parenthood in every case, especially with Black partners.

286

The birth rate between White women and Asian men is equivalent to White women and Black men, when controlling for population size.

287

288