Hate Crimes not charged as hate crimes

1

= Hate Crimes as a Weapon Against Whites =

2

3

[[image:SomeRelevantImage.jpg||width="700px"]]

4

(% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]]

== Overview ==

Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.

9

10

This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.

== 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation ==

15

16

- History of U.S. hate crime statutes

17

- Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language

18

- Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon

19

20

== 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry ==

21

22

- Who qualifies — and who doesn’t

23

- “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites

24

- Legal disparity in application (case law examples)

25

26

== 3. Disparities in Prosecution ==

27

28

- Studies and data showing Whites are:

29

- Charged more often

30

- Punished more harshly

31

- Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks

32

33

== 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==

34

35

36

- [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]

37

- [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]

38

- [ ] Case: [e.g., 2020 BLM riots, White deaths unreported]

39

Each example will follow this format:

40

- Description

41

- Source links

42

- Racial framing in media

43

- Legal outcome (if any)

44

45

46

{{expandable summary="

47

48

📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}}

49

On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}}

50

51

Johnson was killed by a police-controlled explosive during the standoff. As such, ~*~*he was never arrested or charged~*~*. However, the racial motive was clear, and the case met all the elements of a federal hate crime — yet the DOJ made no public declaration, and the media aggressively avoided the racial framing.

52

53

For example:

54

- The [Wikipedia article](https:~/~/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers) cites over 100 news sources — yet ~*~*none mention race in their headlines~*~*

55

- Media focused on Johnson’s military service, stress, and political frustration

56

- Most outlets used passive voice and abstracted motives (“upset over police shootings”) rather than stating the racial targeting directly

57

58

This case shows how hate crimes against White people can be erased not through legal omission, but through narrative control. The framing minimized the racial nature of the crime to avoid disrupting politically useful narratives.

59

60

61

Despite this clear racial motive:

62

- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely

63

- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — none mention race in the headline. You may think this is hyperbolic, but its not. {{footnote}}2016 Shooting of Dallas Police Officers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers{{/footnote}}

64

65

[[image:1752852339655-827.png||data-xwiki-image-style="thumbnail-clickable" width="200"]]

66

67

68

== 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==

69

70

- [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments

71

- [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure

72

- [ ] First Amendment conflicts

73

74

== 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control ==

75

76

- SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists

77

- Google and social platform alignment with hate framing

78

- Lack of advocacy for White victims

79

80

== 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps ==

81

82

- Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified

83

- “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories

84

- States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely

85

86

== 8. Charts and Statistics ==

87

88

{{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}

89

(% id="hatecrimes-stats" %)

90

91

| | | | |

92

| White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National |

93

| Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local or none |

94

| Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable |

95

| Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national |

96

{{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}}

== 9. Conclusions ==

Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.

102

103

== 📄 Related Pages ==

104

105

- [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]

106

- [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]

107

108