Wiki source code of Hate Crimes not charged as hate crimes
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
2.1 | 1 | = Hate Crimes as a Weapon Against Whites = |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | [[image:SomeRelevantImage.jpg||width="700px"]] | ||
| 4 | (% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]] | ||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | == Overview == | ||
| |
4.2 | 7 | |
| |
2.1 | 8 | Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability. |
| 9 | |||
| 10 | This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization. | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | {{toc/}} | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | == 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation == | ||
| |
4.2 | 15 | |
| |
2.1 | 16 | - History of U.S. hate crime statutes |
| 17 | - Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language | ||
| 18 | - Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | == 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry == | ||
| |
4.2 | 21 | |
| |
2.1 | 22 | - Who qualifies — and who doesn’t |
| 23 | - “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites | ||
| 24 | - Legal disparity in application (case law examples) | ||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | == 3. Disparities in Prosecution == | ||
| |
4.2 | 27 | |
| |
2.1 | 28 | - Studies and data showing Whites are: |
| 29 | - Charged more often | ||
| 30 | - Punished more harshly | ||
| 31 | - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | == 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed == | ||
| |
4.2 | 34 | |
| |
2.1 | 35 | {{expandable summary="Examples"}} |
| 36 | - [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron] | ||
| 37 | - [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims] | ||
| 38 | - [ ] Case: [e.g., 2020 BLM riots, White deaths unreported] | ||
| 39 | Each example will follow this format: | ||
| 40 | - Description | ||
| 41 | - Source links | ||
| 42 | - Racial framing in media | ||
| 43 | - Legal outcome (if any) | ||
| 44 | {{/expandable}} | ||
| 45 | |||
| |
4.2 | 46 | {{expandable summary=" |
| |
3.1 | 47 | |
| |
4.2 | 48 | 📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}} |
| |
5.1 | 49 | On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}} |
| |
3.1 | 50 | |
| 51 | Despite this clear racial motive: | ||
| 52 | - Headlines ignored the racial component entirely | ||
| |
7.1 | 53 | - Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — **none** mention race in the headline. You may think this is hyperbolic, but its not. |
| 54 | |||
| 55 | [[image:1752852286848-220.png||data-xwiki-image-style="thumbnail-clickable" width="200"]] | ||
| |
3.1 | 56 | - Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice” |
| 57 | |||
| 58 | This is a textbook example of hate crime **reclassification through omission** — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was **deliberately stripped of that framing** because the victims were White. | ||
| 59 | {{/expandable}} | ||
| 60 | |||
| |
2.1 | 61 | == 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions == |
| |
4.2 | 62 | |
| |
2.1 | 63 | - [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments |
| 64 | - [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure | ||
| 65 | - [ ] First Amendment conflicts | ||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | == 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control == | ||
| |
4.2 | 68 | |
| |
2.1 | 69 | - SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists |
| 70 | - Google and social platform alignment with hate framing | ||
| 71 | - Lack of advocacy for White victims | ||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | == 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps == | ||
| |
4.2 | 74 | |
| |
2.1 | 75 | - Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified |
| 76 | - “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories | ||
| 77 | - States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely | ||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | == 8. Charts and Statistics == | ||
| |
4.2 | 80 | |
| |
2.1 | 81 | {{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}} |
| 82 | (% id="hatecrimes-stats" %) | ||
| |
4.2 | 83 | | Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage | |
| 84 | | | | | | | ||
| 85 | | White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National | | ||
| 86 | | Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local or none | | ||
| 87 | | Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable | | ||
| 88 | | Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national | | ||
| |
2.1 | 89 | {{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}} |
| 90 | {{/expandable}} | ||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | == 9. Conclusions == | ||
| |
4.2 | 93 | |
| |
2.1 | 94 | Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data. |
| 95 | |||
| 96 | == 📄 Related Pages == | ||
| |
4.2 | 97 | |
| |
2.1 | 98 | - [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]] |
| 99 | - [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]] | ||
| 100 | |||
| |
4.2 | 101 | {{putFootnotes/}} |