... |
... |
@@ -1,68 +1,0 @@ |
1 |
|
-(% class="jumbotron" %) |
2 |
|
-((( |
3 |
|
-(% class="container" %) |
4 |
|
-((( |
5 |
|
-= Blacks Counted as White in Crime Stats = |
6 |
|
- |
7 |
|
-[[image:20240605212514.jpg]] |
8 |
|
- |
9 |
|
- |
10 |
|
-))) |
11 |
|
-))) |
12 |
|
- |
13 |
|
-(% class="row" %) |
14 |
|
-((( |
15 |
|
-(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-8" %) |
16 |
|
-((( |
17 |
|
-{{toc /}} |
18 |
|
- |
19 |
|
-= Texas Sex Offender Registry Race/Ethnicity Audit = {{anchor name=“texas-sex-offender-registry-race-ethnicity-audit”/}} |
20 |
|
- |
21 |
|
-== Overview == On **September 9, 2023**, Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime) published an in-depth analysis of the Texas Department of Public Safety’s sex offender registry, focusing on race and ethnicity misclassifications. The thread examines a database of 101,976 registrants and highlights systemic data errors that misrepresent non-White offenders as White. |
22 |
|
- |
23 |
|
-== Data Collection == 1. Downloaded the full Texas Sex Offender Registry: **101,976** entries.\\2. Queried the database to flag potential mismatches between surnames, self-reported race/ethnicity, and demographic patterns.\\3. Used custom scripts to compute initial accuracy metrics. |
24 |
|
- |
25 |
|
-== Key Findings == 1. **Raw Misclassification Counts**\\* Hispanics flagged as “Non-Hispanic White”: **11,541**\\* Blacks flagged as White: **92**\\* Asians flagged as White: **34**\\* Whites flagged as Black: **1** |
26 |
|
- |
27 |
|
-1. **Accuracy Metrics** |
28 |
|
-1*. Initial accuracy: **89.48 %**.\\ |
29 |
|
-1*. After manual verification: **92.27 %**.\\ |
30 |
|
-1*. Remaining false positives to review: **2,590**. |
31 |
|
-1. **Notable Examples** |
32 |
|
-1*. Clusters of “Hernandez” surnames incorrectly marked as White.\\ |
33 |
|
-1*. **Dequan**, a documented Black offender, listed as “Non-Hispanic White.”\\ |
34 |
|
-1*. **Louby Innocent**, originally marked Black in Florida, appeared as White in Texas. |
35 |
|
- |
36 |
|
-== Methodology == 1. Automated surname-based queries to generate candidate mismatches.\\2. Manual review of flagged entries by cross-referencing public DPS records.\\3. Iterative re-runs to refine the matching algorithm and reduce false positives. |
37 |
|
- |
38 |
|
-== Impact and Next Steps == 1. Archived original registry entries to preserve evidence before corrections.\\2. Planned release of a comprehensive spreadsheet with all verified entries and source links.\\3. Recommendation: Texas DPS should implement routine data audits to ensure accurate race/ethnicity reporting. |
39 |
|
- |
40 |
|
-== References == {{footnote reference=“1”}}Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime). “Texas Sex Offender Registry Analysis!” Twitter thread, Sep 9, 2023. Available at [[Thread Reader App>>https:~/~/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1700341490206310416]]{{/footnote}}\\{{footnote reference=“2”}}Texas Department of Public Safety. “Sex Offender Registry.” Available at [[DPS Public Site>>https:~/~/publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry]]{{/footnote}} |
41 |
|
- |
42 |
|
-{{footnotes/}} |
43 |
|
-))) |
44 |
|
- |
45 |
|
- |
46 |
|
- |
47 |
|
- |
48 |
|
- |
49 |
|
- |
50 |
|
- |
51 |
|
- |
52 |
|
- |
53 |
|
- |
54 |
|
-(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4" %) |
55 |
|
-((( |
56 |
|
-{{box title="**Contents**"}} |
57 |
|
-{{toc/}} |
58 |
|
-{{/box}} |
59 |
|
- |
60 |
|
-[[Sex offender statistics comparison before and after nonwhites were correctly switched to their respective races.>>image:comparison.png||alt="image1.jpg"]] |
61 |
|
- |
62 |
|
- |
63 |
|
-//Figure 1: [[Comparison>>attach:1000000503.jpg]]// |
64 |
|
- |
65 |
|
-[[image:blacks counted as white[Injustice_ ethnicity_ image_ images_ non-hispanic_ race_ texas_ white].jpg||alt="image2.jpg"]] |
66 |
|
-//Figure 2: [[Archived Examples>>attach:blacks counted as white[Injustice_ ethnicity_ image_ images_ non-hispanic_ race_ texas_ white].jpg]]// |
67 |
|
-))) |
68 |
|
-))) |