... |
... |
@@ -1,0 +1,68 @@ |
|
1 |
+(% class="jumbotron" %) |
|
2 |
+((( |
|
3 |
+(% class="container" %) |
|
4 |
+((( |
|
5 |
+= Blacks Counted as White in Crime Stats = |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+[[image:20240605212514.jpg]] |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+))) |
|
11 |
+))) |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+(% class="row" %) |
|
14 |
+((( |
|
15 |
+(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-8" %) |
|
16 |
+((( |
|
17 |
+{{toc /}} |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+= Texas Sex Offender Registry Race/Ethnicity Audit = {{anchor name=“texas-sex-offender-registry-race-ethnicity-audit”/}} |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+== Overview == On **September 9, 2023**, Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime) published an in-depth analysis of the Texas Department of Public Safety’s sex offender registry, focusing on race and ethnicity misclassifications. The thread examines a database of 101,976 registrants and highlights systemic data errors that misrepresent non-White offenders as White. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+== Data Collection == 1. Downloaded the full Texas Sex Offender Registry: **101,976** entries.\\2. Queried the database to flag potential mismatches between surnames, self-reported race/ethnicity, and demographic patterns.\\3. Used custom scripts to compute initial accuracy metrics. |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+== Key Findings == 1. **Raw Misclassification Counts**\\* Hispanics flagged as “Non-Hispanic White”: **11,541**\\* Blacks flagged as White: **92**\\* Asians flagged as White: **34**\\* Whites flagged as Black: **1** |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+1. **Accuracy Metrics** |
|
28 |
+1*. Initial accuracy: **89.48 %**.\\ |
|
29 |
+1*. After manual verification: **92.27 %**.\\ |
|
30 |
+1*. Remaining false positives to review: **2,590**. |
|
31 |
+1. **Notable Examples** |
|
32 |
+1*. Clusters of “Hernandez” surnames incorrectly marked as White.\\ |
|
33 |
+1*. **Dequan**, a documented Black offender, listed as “Non-Hispanic White.”\\ |
|
34 |
+1*. **Louby Innocent**, originally marked Black in Florida, appeared as White in Texas. |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+== Methodology == 1. Automated surname-based queries to generate candidate mismatches.\\2. Manual review of flagged entries by cross-referencing public DPS records.\\3. Iterative re-runs to refine the matching algorithm and reduce false positives. |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+== Impact and Next Steps == 1. Archived original registry entries to preserve evidence before corrections.\\2. Planned release of a comprehensive spreadsheet with all verified entries and source links.\\3. Recommendation: Texas DPS should implement routine data audits to ensure accurate race/ethnicity reporting. |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+== References == {{footnote reference=“1”}}Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime). “Texas Sex Offender Registry Analysis!” Twitter thread, Sep 9, 2023. Available at [[Thread Reader App>>https:~/~/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1700341490206310416]]{{/footnote}}\\{{footnote reference=“2”}}Texas Department of Public Safety. “Sex Offender Registry.” Available at [[DPS Public Site>>https:~/~/publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry]]{{/footnote}} |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+{{footnotes/}} |
|
43 |
+))) |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4" %) |
|
55 |
+((( |
|
56 |
+{{box title="**Contents**"}} |
|
57 |
+{{toc/}} |
|
58 |
+{{/box}} |
|
59 |
+ |
|
60 |
+[[Sex offender statistics comparison before and after nonwhites were correctly switched to their respective races.>>image:comparison.png||alt="image1.jpg"]] |
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+ |
|
63 |
+//Figure 1: [[Comparison>>attach:1000000503.jpg]]// |
|
64 |
+ |
|
65 |
+[[image:blacks counted as white[Injustice_ ethnicity_ image_ images_ non-hispanic_ race_ texas_ white].jpg||alt="image2.jpg"]] |
|
66 |
+//Figure 2: [[Archived Examples>>attach:blacks counted as white[Injustice_ ethnicity_ image_ images_ non-hispanic_ race_ texas_ white].jpg]]// |
|
67 |
+))) |
|
68 |
+))) |